|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
$50 NL 10 handed graph
I multitable $50 NL Fullring.
Is these "bumps" I have in my graph normal? When I got the first bump I thought it was my first bad downswing and if I made it thru I could manage anything. Then a few day later I get another one. It's about 10 buyins each downswing. I don't feel I'm playing bad, maybe I have a hard time laying down AA on a non scary board and a tight player raises me on turn and I allways get busted by a set. And also I allways have the lower set when it's set over set. Oh well, I've read about it here before, people playing good for a long time and then they have a huge downswing. So I guess I'm just one of those guys. Variance is a biatch! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL 10 handed graph
Uh, this is completely normal.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL 10 handed graph
OK, thanks, that was what I needed [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Can I expect bigger downswings? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL 10 handed graph
it depends on the games you play and your style of play. bigger downswings can be expected if you're playing in SH aggro games.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL 10 handed graph
Have you seriously played 100K hands of .25/.50 NL? I thought only sourbeaver was capable of staying at that level for that long-- most people move up.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL 10 handed graph
I did move up, but not "by the book" tho.
First I tried 6max at .25/.50 then I tried 1/2 and 2/4 6max but it totally sucked, I couldn't take a 6xbuyin loss at 2/4 so I moved back to where I actually made money, and that is .25/.50 full ring. I think it's the SH step I can't take, and when you move up there isn't as much full ring games. I'm more comfortable playing .25/.50 cause there I can take a 10 x buyin downswing not getting to mad. At the higher limits I get to angry and start tilting. I was trying to play 2/4 6max at prima, my goal was only to break even and make money on rakebakc, it started out well but then I got a 5 x buyin downswing and I started to doubt my game and tried all kinda stuff but it only made it worse... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL 10 handed graph
Your win rate is pretty low, 4+-2 PTBB/100. Your low win rate means you will have more frequent and larger downswings than someone winning 10 PTBB/100. Dropping 10 buy-ins isn't pleasant, but it is not a huge surprise. That's why the recommended bankroll is over 10 buy-ins even for those with a higher win rate. See this bankroll discussion.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL 10 handed graph
I think the reason why I have around 4 PTBB/100 is cause I play 8 tables (have also been play 12 tables). If I play 1 table I could easy have 8 PTBB/100 but its much more profitable having 4 PTBB/100 playing 8 tables. Also you don't need to get to tricky to get 4 PTBB/100 so I can easy play 8 tables and watch tv at the same time.
My true hourly winrate is about 20$/hour. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL 10 handed graph
[ QUOTE ]
I think the reason why I have around 4 PTBB/100 is cause I play 8 tables (have also been play 12 tables). If I play 1 table I could easy have 8 PTBB/100 but its much more profitable having 4 PTBB/100 playing 8 tables. Also you don't need to get to tricky to get 4 PTBB/100 so I can easy play 8 tables and watch tv at the same time. My true hourly winrate is about 20$/hour. [/ QUOTE ] you can 8table and have a much higher winrate, push yourself to do better |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $50 NL 10 handed graph
Move up immediately. Drop to 4-tables.
|
|
|