![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
so says cnn...
"Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff, was indicted today by a grand jury on one count of obstruction of justice, two counts of making false statements and two counts of perjury in the CIA leak probe. The indictments are the first in a nearly two-year investigation into the public unmasking of an undercover CIA operative." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Two counts each of perjury and making false statements, and one count of obstruction of justice.
EDIT- I see you already edited that into your post. Nevermind! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Libby resigns.
Expected. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wonder why, after 2 years, he can't either indite Rove or let him off the hook. As I understand it, he is keeping the investigation into Rove open, maybe even extending the Grand Jury. Perhaps Rove really is off the hook.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
</font><blockquote><font class="small">En respuesta a:</font><hr />
I wonder why, after 2 years, he can't either indite Rove or let him off the hook. As I understand it, he is keeping the investigation into Rove open, maybe even extending the Grand Jury. Perhaps Rove really is off the hook. [/ QUOTE ] If Rove is guilty of anything, he is way too savvy to have done it in such a way for it to ever stick. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I wonder why, after 2 years, he can't either indite Rove or let him off the hook. As I understand it, he is keeping the investigation into Rove open, maybe even extending the Grand Jury. Perhaps Rove really is off the hook. [/ QUOTE ] If Rove is guilty of anything, he is way too savvy to have done it in such a way for it to ever stick. [/ QUOTE ] You're contradicting yourself. Rove's a scumbag and I believe he'll be indicted eventually. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How am I contradicting myself?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Misread your post, sorry bout that.
Rove's still a scumbag though and saavy has nothing to do with him getting off. Crony-ism and an American public that doesn't care might though. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I wonder why, after 2 years, he can't either indite Rove or let him off the hook. As I understand it, he is keeping the investigation into Rove open, maybe even extending the Grand Jury. Perhaps Rove really is off the hook. [/ QUOTE ] If Rove is guilty of anything, he is way too savvy to have done it in such a way for it to ever stick. [/ QUOTE ] You're contradicting yourself. Rove's a scumbag and I believe he'll be indicted eventually. [/ QUOTE ] No, you think hes a scumbag and you want him to be indicted. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I wonder why, after 2 years, he can't either indite Rove or let him off the hook. As I understand it, he is keeping the investigation into Rove open, maybe even extending the Grand Jury. Perhaps Rove really is off the hook. [/ QUOTE ] If Rove is guilty of anything, he is way too savvy to have done it in such a way for it to ever stick. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, Fitzgerald just said nobody else is going to be indited. Republicans were right, this was a bunch of hooey. What a horrible Fitzmas! [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] |
![]() |
|
|