|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
SHH strategies in loose mid-limit games
sorry if this has been discussed before, I couldn't find it...
do you guys recommend using SHH strategies in these types of games, or are you using more HFAP strategies and less SSH? I'm specifically talking about: ** raising mid-pair on the flop after an intial bet to get others behind you to fold. ** More often than not calling down a CR on the turn with an overpair and some decent "hidden" outs. and so on.... It just seems that there's not much difference between the majority of these players and a $3-$6 game at the Orleans. What do you guys think? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SHH strategies in loose mid-limit games
[ QUOTE ]
** raising mid-pair on the flop after an intial bet to get others behind you to fold. [/ QUOTE ] Depends on the game and the particular opponents. [ QUOTE ] ** More often than not calling down a CR on the turn with an overpair and some decent "hidden" outs. [/ QUOTE ] Depends on the game and the particular opponent(s). -Brad |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SHH strategies in loose mid-limit games
[ QUOTE ]
do you guys recommend using SHH strategies in these types of games, or are you using more HFAP strategies and less SSH? [/ QUOTE ] Which type of games? The SSH strategies are primarily designed for passive games. Once the play becomes more aggressive you should adapt. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SHH strategies in loose mid-limit games
There's nothing magical about the denomination of chips in play at a table. If the game fits the preconditions in SSH, go ahead and use concepts from there.
A friend who is very into martial arts tells me you don't master different styles and then use them in a vacuum, rather you would likely make use of different styles in the same fight. I think it's a pretty good anaology for poker- pull out the crouching tiger or hidden dragon (SSH or HEPFAP) as appropriate-depending on whether it's a loose/tight/passive/aggressive game, and whether loose/passive or tight/aggressive players have entered the pot already. Remember that both books are essentially explorations of the theory of poker given different opposition. 2nd |
|
|