|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
I still hate pocket pairs...
Alright, this may be standard for all you guys but marginal situations like this are a big leak for me. I had just played an orbit, no one in the hand had gotten particularly out of line. The flop bettor was pretty taggish, about 25/9 stats and had played the one hand I saw aggressively with no showdown. Apart from this hand, there was about 4 to an average flop.
Party Poker 0.50/1 Hold'em (9 handed) converter Preflop: Hero is UTG with 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. Hero calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP1 calls, <font color="#666666">5 folds</font>, BB checks. Flop: (3.50 SB) 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">BB bets</font>, Hero... The question is, do we feel strong enough here to raise? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I still hate pocket pairs...
Reraise. Call a 3bet, re-evaluate on turn.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I still hate pocket pairs...
[ QUOTE ]
Reraise. Call a 3bet, re-evaluate on turn. [/ QUOTE ] uhh, I'm instamucking to a 3bet. what are we ahead of? ok, a flush draw yes. but their fd could easily have a card higher than a 7, which gives them more outs against us. the pot is just too small |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I still hate pocket pairs...
In a pot that small... fold. You're only getting 4:1 if you're behind and you have NO IDEA what the BB has since he got a free play.
That or you could re-raise on the flop, call if 3-bet and then decide on the turn. If you miss your backdoor draws and your seven, and it's bet into you again, then dump your hand. I'd still prefer folding in this small a pot. Come on... 3 bets? You can practically make that up just by stealing the blinds once. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I still hate pocket pairs...
Raise or fold situation, I go with fold.
4:1 and SO MANY cards that can cause problems. Next [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img] |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I still hate pocket pairs...
I'd fold. This isn't a flush draw often enough to justify fighting for the 2BB IMO.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I still hate pocket pairs...
Pretty routine fold. Small pot, you're way behind everything villain is representing, etc.
Change the flop to 996 and I raise. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I still hate pocket pairs...
[ QUOTE ]
Change the flop to 996 and I raise. [/ QUOTE ] Noob question but, why does the change make any difference. I take it, you are then counterfeiting the 6's and it's less likely he has a 9 for trips. Would you still raise, say if it was 6TT, or 6JJ and above or would you give him credit for having at least one high card? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I still hate pocket pairs...
When villain bets, he is saying he has some piece of the board. If the flop is 966, I cannot beat anything villain could have. I am ahead only of a smaller pocket pair, a draw, or a pure bluff.
When the flop is 996, I am now beating any 6, which is frequently what villain will be betting. So now that I'm beating a broader range of hands, I want to play, and if I'm going to play, I might as well raise. Basically, if you hold a pocket pair and face a paired flop, you should be much more inclined to get involved if your pocket pair outranks the unpaired card on board. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I still hate pocket pairs...
And, many villians will not lead out, when flopping top trips into a smallish (3 people) field. So I do agree that the 966 flop bet represents two hands you can't beat much more often than 996 does.
|
|
|