1st 10k of 6max

[jph0424]

Here are the stats from my 1st 10k 6 max hands. What needs work? Thanks.

PT stats

when you get to the link, click on the image for a larger clearer view. I did this because I am an idiot and could not get the image to appear by using the "image" UBB button and entering the website.

[mack848]

I see no image.

[topspinner]

Very nice stats, those are just about what I am striving for in about every area. I don't see anything out of line, but what do I know I am just a lowly 1-2 player.

Question for you, did you play 1-2 six max, before moving up? If so what was your bb/100? The reason I ask is two fold, one is I am wondering what the win rate would be with optimum stats (mine is 4.7 with many leaks) and also I have thought about moving up to 5-10 and wonder how win rate from 1-2 translates to 5-10. Thanks

[jph0424]

I didn't play any 1/2 6max before starting at 5/10. The reason is that I had plenty of bankroll from full ring games and felt comfortable enough adapting to a shorthanded game. I played one table for the first thousand or so hands and then played 2. I have been lurking here for over a year since I read TOP and HPFAP. I since have reread those multiple times and picked up a bunch of other 2+2 stuff. This site deserves a bunch of the credit for making me a winning player. When I posted those stats I really wasn't expecting so many positive responses because I figured I probably wasn't doing something optimally. Thanks for all the responses.

JP

[NLSoldier]

Wow, I honestly can't find anything in your stats to criticize. Maybe increase your PFR by a % or 2 but thats about it. I think your stats look really freaking good. Its a small sample but if your stats continue like that I think you should be able to maintain close to that winrate.

[krishanleong]

[ QUOTE ]
Its a small sample but if your stats continue like that I think you should be able to maintain close to that winrate.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree if close means within 2.5 BBs.

Krishan

[NLSoldier]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Its a small sample but if your stats continue like that I think you should be able to maintain close to that winrate.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree if close means within 2.5 BBs.

Krishan

[/ QUOTE ]

lol, I was thinking he should be able to maintain 2.5+bb/100. So I guess I meant within abou 1bb

[mperich]

If his postflop play is good and he is valuebetting well I think he is definately somewhere between 3 and 4/100.

-Mike

[krishanleong]

[ QUOTE ]
If his postflop play is good and he is valuebetting well I think he is definately somewhere between 3 and 4/100.

-Mike

[/ QUOTE ]

You guys are insane. You can't extrapolate win rate from stats. Your postflop play has to be better than good to sustain 3+ BB/100. I'm willing to bet just from his posting 10K stats + his registration date that he is running hot.

Krishan

[mperich]

[ QUOTE ]
You can't extrapolate win rate from stats.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nate had a very interesting post a couple of days ago with some research into this.

Link

While true that I believe this has slightly less relevence to shorthanded play, I don't think it's dismissable.

[ QUOTE ]
Your postflop play has to be better than good to sustain 3+ BB/100.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe very good, but definately not great or near-perfect, especially if you are not playing 4+ tables.

Maybe he is running hot, but like I said with very good postflop play and if he is valuebetting properly, 3-4 would be very possible. (Probably closer to 3 but who knows)

-Mike