|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
I think this is right but scuba disagrees
Game No : 3272946676
***** Hand History for Game 3272946676 ***** NL Texas Hold'em $30 Buy-in + $3 Entry Fee Trny:18664529 Level:6 Blinds(100/200) - Wednesday, December 28, 00:51:23 EDT 2005 Table Table 68111 (Real Money) Seat 5 is the button Total number of players : 4 Seat 1: elcheapo23 ( $1617 ) Seat 3: hueys46 ( $4540 ) Seat 5: wnlake5 ( $930 ) Seat 10: Scuba_Chuck ( $913 ) Trny:18664529 Level:6 Blinds(100/200) ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to elcheapo23 [ Kh 3d ] >You have options at Table 66918 Table!. hueys46 folds. wnlake5 folds. Scuba_Chuck is all-In [813] elcheapo23 calls [713]. ** Dealing Flop ** [ 9d, Jd, Th ] ** Dealing Turn ** [ 7s ] ** Dealing River ** [ Jh ] Scuba_Chuck shows [ Ts, Td ] a full house, Tens full of jacks. elcheapo23 shows [ Kh, 3d ] a pair of jacks. Scuba_Chuck wins 1826 chips from the main pot with a full house, Tens full of jacks. >You have options at Table 66918 Table!. Game #3272948674 starts. 713 to win 1826 and scuba needs to push here. This is a nobrainer and yet he berates me for this call. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I think this is right but scuba disagrees
[ QUOTE ]
713 to win 1826 and scuba needs to push here. This is a nobrainer and yet he berates me for this call. [/ QUOTE ] Well, take the 713 back out of that 1826. You're being laid 1113:713, which isn't nearly as attractive. Add in the other severe shorty, and I'm pretty sure your crappy K isn't going to perform well enough to make calling here good. So I think this is poor. EDIT: I'll preempt curtains and point out that this is an SNGPT question if there ever was one. If you don't have it, this isn't a very tough situation to ICM, but I'm lazy and tend to answer based on my intuitions from the time when I actually looked at these kind of things. Serious pushbot minutia aren't so important in regular Stars STT's, at least at low buyins. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I think this is right but scuba disagrees
If I fold I'm still midlevel stack. If shortstack had 500 or 600 then the fold would be easier but I think this is the right call because if I'm in scuba's shoes you don't even look at your cards and push
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I think this is right but scuba disagrees
I think the most important part of Grumps post is when he explains how you should calculate the pot odds. If your not calling for pot odds in this BORDERLINE situation, than what are you calling for???? So I think the fact that you have the pot odds all wrong, makes this even more of an obviously mistake.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I think this is right but scuba disagrees
I call this in a flash.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I think this is right but scuba disagrees
Based on what? What a joke.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I think this is right but scuba disagrees
[ QUOTE ]
Based on what? What a joke. [/ QUOTE ] Easy there GtrHtr. I think I'd fold, but calling is hardly ridiculous. After all, against many players, K high is likely the better hand. And you're getting decent odds. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I think this is right but scuba disagrees
haha, ur right, dude just gets under my skin. EZ fold tho
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I think this is right but scuba disagrees
[ QUOTE ]
Based on what? What a joke. [/ QUOTE ] Meh. Instead of doing the math myself, I took his word for what the ratio was. I was way wrong apparently. Whoops. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I think this is right but scuba disagrees
good man, gl in miami, sorry to be so harsh.
|
|
|