|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
PP 30+3, 88 in the big blind
***** Hand History for Game 3220051136 *****
NL Texas Hold'em $30 Buy-in + $3 Entry Fee Trny:18376800 Level:3 Blinds(25/50) - Sunday, December 18, 00:30:54 EDT 2005 Table Table 67264 (Real Money) Seat 9 is the button Total number of players : 8 Seat 1: Hero ( $980 ) Seat 5: player1 ( $460 ) Seat 8: player2 ( $955 ) Seat 9: player3 ( $1550 ) Seat 3: Villan ( $880 ) Seat 10: player4 ( $455 ) Seat 4: player5 ( $800 ) Seat 7: player6 ( $1920 ) Trny:18376800 Level:3 Blinds(25/50) ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to Hero [ 8c 8s ] Villan calls [50]. player5 folds. player1 did not respond in time. player1 folds. player6 folds. player2 folds. player3 folds. player4 folds. Hero checks. ** Dealing Flop ** [ 9c, Qh, 4c ] Hero checks. Villan bets [100]. Hero raises [300]. Villan calls [200]. ** Dealing Turn ** [ 3s ] Hero??? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PP 30+3, 88 in the big blind
Why in the world would you check/raise that flop?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PP 30+3, 88 in the big blind
Figured on a limp with two suited cards or high connectors. Pot sized bet after an open limp, wanted to see what I may be up against. No flush draw, doubted against 2p, read the bet as "don't call, fold...."
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PP 30+3, 88 in the big blind
If that is your read then just lead flop, cheper if you are wrong.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PP 30+3, 88 in the big blind
So try to go for standard continuation bet, and be ready to muck it if reraised?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PP 30+3, 88 in the big blind
In order to qualify as a continuation bet, you would have had to raise preflop. Which, as a matter of fact, is probably a good idea.
So yea. On the flop either bet/fold or check/fold. |
|
|