Why Party opposes rakeback....thanks BusterStacks!

[Sintax]

After reading virtually every thread and opinion on the Party rakeback issue, I was convinced there was absolutely no reason they should give a damn what their affiliates promote to their players.

Then I read BusterStacks post. I realized how poorly one promise breaking rouge affiliate can reflect on Party itself. An internal VIP makes perfect sense for any player as long as their are "no better then common street thief" type affiliates like BusterStacks.

[TheHammer24]

This doesn't make sense. They could easily offer rakeback directly to their players instead of VIP programs.

[ThaSaltCracka]

[ QUOTE ]
This doesn't make sense. They could easily offer rakeback directly to their players instead of VIP programs.

[/ QUOTE ]yeah for real. The real reason party didn't want to continue rakeback is because 1. they don't need to, and 2. they don't want to.

[NLSoldier]

this post is retarded.

[Sintax]

Seriously, if Party openly endorsed rakeback through their affiliates, and then one of them goes rouge, who is going to have to clean up the mess? The players complain to Party, then they will need new accounts under new affiliates etc...

[ThaSaltCracka]

god damn you are dumb.

[Sintax]

Because you are BusterStacks lapdog, doesnt make me dumb

[ThaSaltCracka]

BusterStacks is not my affiliate, nor am I associated with his company at all. So no, I am not his "lapdog".

[somapopper]

This response and NLSoldiers are both incredibly rude. I can only assume that you both think that a very high post count gives you the right to degrade whomever you feel like.

[Zetack]

[ QUOTE ]

Then I read BusterStacks post. I realized how poorly one promise breaking rouge affiliate can reflect on Party itself.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
if Party openly endorsed rakeback through their affiliates, and then one of them goes rouge,

[/ QUOTE ]

Um...so Party has a thing against make-up wearing affiliates? I'm going to have to check with my fiance on this one.


--Zetack