|
|
|
|
#3
05-01-2005, 06:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: percentage of users having PT and PokerEdge
More info on PokerEdge at http://www.poker-edge.com/ (imo when you invest in PT you should invest in PE too)
|
|
#4
05-01-2005, 08:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: percentage of users having PT and PokerEdge
[ QUOTE ]
More info on PokerEdge at http://www.poker-edge.com/ (imo when you invest in PT you should invest in PE too) [/ QUOTE ] or you could just datamine for free
|
|
#7
05-01-2005, 10:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: percentage of users having PT and PokerEdge
[ QUOTE ]
(imo when you invest in PT you should invest in PE too) [/ QUOTE ] imo when you register and suggest a commercial product with your first post, you are shilling and should buy an ad
|
|
#9
05-02-2005, 11:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: percentage of users having PT and PokerEdge
[ QUOTE ]
seriously. PokerEdge is a waste of money. Datamining + PV makes a lot more sense. [/ QUOTE ] Explain, I say this as a PokerEdge fan [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] I use PokerEdge only for table selection. When playing PV is obviously much better. I have read that some people datamine for 30minutes before sitting at a table! Damn, this is more expensive than the $10,- /month PE fee.
|
|
#10
05-02-2005, 12:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: percentage of users having PT and PokerEdge
Didn't mean to promote any product, just had no idea there was any alternative. Never heard of datamining and playerview before.
So if I understand correctly the following is considered to be wise: - using PT+PE for table selection (if you consider PE to be a waste use you're own collected data instead) - use PV for playing (initially makes use of the PE database, later also/only of the hands you're playing at that moment) One question remains: is it still useful to datamine on a table you're not playing or intending to when you have PE or does PE provide you with that data anyway in the following hours (put otherwise: do they watch ALL tables above .5/1?) Thanks for your patience with me.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
