|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
bottom set w/ 2 all-ins in front
5-10 at hp... effective stacks are $1500... table just started 30 minutes ago...i've played w/ utg and co once before. utg seemed reasonable and cutoff was sort of aggressive in a wacky way, didnt seem like a good player though i hadn't seen him show down a hand yet.
utg limps, mp1 makes it 40, co calls, i call on button w/ 2 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]2 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], blinds fold, utg calls flop is k [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]8 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]9 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] check, check, check, check turn is 2 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] utg bets 150, mp1 folds, co calls, i make it 500, both call river is 7 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] utg bets 500, co pushes, i...? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bottom set w/ 2 all-ins in front
looks like a very easy fold.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bottom set w/ 2 all-ins in front
Easy fold...
Too bad you were a winner here |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bottom set w/ 2 all-ins in front
Sometimes you end up folding the best hand. If you never fold the best hand then you are calling way too much.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bottom set w/ 2 all-ins in front
fold. someone has JT or a flush
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bottom set w/ 2 all-ins in front
you could raise a little more on the turn... but other than that, well played.
Oh yeah, probably an easy fold. CO has balls of iron if you have him beat. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bottom set w/ 2 all-ins in front
It's called the muck
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
results
i folded and proceeded to vomit when cutoff showed 89o and utg called and showed one of the must butchered AA hands i've seen in a while.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: bottom set w/ 2 all-ins in front
No way your hand is good. Someone has got to have a flush or a straight.
|
|
|