|
|
|
|
#1
06-25-2005, 04:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
quote
Here is a quote from a full tilt prolesson which I think applies to this forum.
"How much of a difference is there between ring game strategy and tournament strategy? The answer: Not as much as you think. Before you worry about adjusting for tournaments, concentrate on adjusting for the other players. The most important skill in poker is the ability to react to a wide range of opponents playing a wide range of styles. Players who can do this will thrive in both ring games and tournaments alike. Many of the most costly tournament mistakes are the result of players over-adjusting for tournament play. " I think that most of this forum has a "sng strategy" instead of just playing the game. I think that when I am playing bad, I think it is because I am getting into the habit of trying to figure out a sng strategy, such as tightening up early, instead of just playing poker. If you are a winning player in ring games, you should be trying to play as many hands as possible. You can certainly make money in sngs by playing as an 8 vpip in the first three levels, but I think you can make more by playing what you would in a regular ring game. I have some more thoughts, but suck at typing them out, so I guess I will end here. 
|
|
#2
06-25-2005, 04:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: quote
[ QUOTE ]
You can certainly make money in sngs by playing as an 8 vpip in the first three levels, but I think you can make more by playing what you would in a regular ring game. I have some more thoughts, but suck at typing them out, so I guess I will end here. [/ QUOTE ] The big difference is that you can't play draws in the way you can at limit ring tables. That's not to say you shouldn't play suited/connected hands when the situation is right but you shouldn't do it based on your mad postflop skills, at least not at the lower limits. But the general idea is good. I find that whenever I go back and re-check after thinking "how could he call there" etc, I will find more often than not based on the players previous actions my response should have been "how could I have thought he wouldn't call with that kind of hand there". When multitabling it is very easy to let a few PV numbers do the thinking for you and a lot of big clues are missed.
|
|
#3
06-25-2005, 11:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: quote
This is precisely the comment (By Jesus) that got me thinking about my "blind challenge."
I play SNGs much differently than I play all other forms of poker. But I respect Ferguson's opinions more than any other pro alive because of his game theory background. It occured to me that the main distinguishing factor between my SNG play and my ring game play is that almost all of my SNG decisions are based on my cards: -Levels 1-3 fold all but the top X% -Levels 4-bubble fold all but top Y% -Bubble-ITM push with top Z%, call with top (Z - Zfraction)% I see 12-14% of flops in SNGs, whereas in ring games and MTTs I'm usually one of the more active players at the table. But in the other games, my cards are rarely a primary consideration in my decision to play a hand. So, it's funny that you mention this quote. Here's what I think: 1. If you play the standard SNG strategy advocated on this forum you will win. 2. If you are a winning ring game player and you play your standard ring game style in SNGs, you will win. 3. The approach that will give you the highest ROI depends on how good your ring game play is. 4. A great ring game player playing his standard game will do better than a perfect "strategy" player in SNGs. 5. It's much easier to teach and learn SNG strategy than it is to teach or learn poker. Irieguy
|
|
#4
06-25-2005, 12:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: quote
[ QUOTE ]
2. If you are a winning ring game player and you play your standard ring game style in SNGs, you will win. [/ QUOTE ] I think this statement is pretty questionable. I think it's true that you can be a winning (not great) ring game player without much idea of how to handle a short stack. I think you can also be a winning ring game player and get hosed on the bubble, though I guess these are sort of related ideas. The rest of it I all agree with.
|
|
#5
06-25-2005, 01:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: quote
Out of curiosity, when you say ring games, do you refer to LHE, NLHE, or both?
|
|
#7
06-25-2005, 04:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: quote
[ QUOTE ]
It occured to me that the main distinguishing factor between my SNG play and my ring game play is that almost all of my SNG decisions are based on my cards: [/ QUOTE ] Hmm. Almost all my decisions in both SnG's and ring games are based on your cards, too! (Sorry, couldn't resist.)
|
|
#10
06-25-2005, 12:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: quote
[ QUOTE ]
this is exactly how i feel, i bust out 7-10th about 27% of the time and 10th now about 6% of the time and i dont consider it a leak. [/ QUOTE ] If you're busting out in 7-10th 27% of the time you should probably tighten up and stop playing so many unprofitable hands.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
