|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
JJ level 2, good play or reckless?
Figured the short stack didn't have a monster here. Thoughts?
Seat 1: D_U_C_E (525) Seat 3: smokin0569 (1460) Seat 4: andykatz66 (895) Seat 5: The_Box_Man (745) Seat 6: beerman1225 (670) Seat 7: bhaney14 (790) Seat 8: iamlosing (345) Seat 9: Hero (725) Seat 10: denaman11 (1845) D_U_C_E posts small blind (15) smokin0569 posts big blind (30) ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to Hero [ Jh, Jc ] iamlosing: thanks andykatz66 folds. The_Box_Man folds. beerman1225 calls (30) bhaney14 folds. D_U_C_E: no prob iamlosing raises (345) to 345 iamlosing is all-In. Hero raises (725) to 725 Hero is all-In. denaman11 folds. D_U_C_E folds. smokin0569 folds. beerman1225 folds. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: JJ level 2, good play or reckless?
Seems alright to me. I like this more as a squeeze move though, like limping behind UTG, have someone raise later on, a couple of callers, UTG calling, then push with JJ. It can pick up a lot of dead chips..
.. and UTG will often call with a less than premium hand, too, especially as they're crap enough to have a) limped and b) just called with whatever they've got. Mid pairs and AT-AJ aren't unusual at all. PS His range has to be 99+, AQ+ or tighter to make doing this incorrect, which is probably far too tight. I mean, he would do this with 77 and 88 too, and no doubt, AJ and KQ. Maybe even some lower suited Aces.. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: JJ level 2, good play or reckless?
I play it the same. More often than not shorty has a weak ace or a small pair.
|
|
|