Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > Multi-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-02-2005, 10:40 AM
fnurt fnurt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 292
Default Standard, yet worth discussing

Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t20 (10 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx

UTG+2 (t2325)
MP1 (t365)
MP2 (t925)
MP3 (t685)
CO (t1780)
Button (t905)
Hero (t940)
BB (t720)
UTG (t720)
UTG+1 (t1635)

Preflop: Hero is SB with 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
UTG calls t20, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, MP2 calls t20, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, CO calls t20, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Hero completes, BB checks.

Flop: (t100) 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font>
Hero bets 60, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG raises to 175, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, Hero...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-02-2005, 10:46 AM
Slow Play Ray Slow Play Ray is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Beantown
Posts: 527
Default Re: Standard, yet worth discussing

...calls.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-02-2005, 11:07 AM
twolf twolf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 111
Default Re: Standard, yet worth discussing

given his stack and the blinds, I assume he sucks and has a K. You have little fold equity on a push so just call with good implied odds. There will be 450 in the pot on the turn to which he will likely push his last 525 at which point you will fold given the bad odds on your allin call. Very standard, yes?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-02-2005, 11:23 AM
Blindcurve Blindcurve is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: Standard, yet worth discussing

[ QUOTE ]
You have little fold equity on a push so just call with good implied odds.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is the question, really. I don't think you have enough FE on the flop, but I think you might be able to push any non-flush, ace or 3 turn card, and force UTG into a decision.
Of course, your chances will be significantly worse at that point, but if you've mentally committed to seeing both cards, then maybe the turn push will give you a slightly bigger chance of taking down the pot uncontested.

It is also entirely possible UTG is drawing to a smaller flush. I think he has something like KJ-K8.

-D.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-02-2005, 11:26 AM
fnurt fnurt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 292
Default Re: Standard, yet worth discussing

[ QUOTE ]
given his stack and the blinds, I assume he sucks and has a K. You have little fold equity on a push so just call with good implied odds. There will be 450 in the pot on the turn to which he will likely push his last 525 at which point you will fold given the bad odds on your allin call. Very standard, yes?

[/ QUOTE ]

Interesting. Don't I turn myself from a slight favorite into a substantial dog by adopting this line?

I also wonder if I have much in the way of implied odds given how obvious my draw is.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-04-2005, 01:37 PM
John W John W is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 27
Default Re: Standard, yet worth discussing

You lead with it, Im not sure how abvious it is. What's obvious is that UTG is going broke this hand, win or lose. I like calling here and seeing what developes on the turn. If I get the feeling that someone is ready to go broke, I suggest trying to make a hand first and calling $115 to win the rest of his stack is the cheapest and some would say the safer way, or the weak way to play the hand, but i hate to get knocked out on a draw early a tournament when I could have just called a cheap bet and proceeded from there.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-04-2005, 01:13 PM
John W John W is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 27
Default Re: Well said TWolf

Well said. T.wolf
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-02-2005, 11:17 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Standard, yet worth discussing

I love having a pair and a flush draw, but I would worry that my ace isn't an out here. I'd call for only 115 more, and if you spike a spade, you are gold, and if you spike a 3, you are most likely good. He most likely has AK, KQ, or KJs, and possibly 66. You either got 9 outs, 11 outs, or 14 outs, I'd assume the 11 and gamble that he doesn't have pocket 6's.

If he prices you out of a turn (likely he is going all in on the turn givenb his stack), muck it, you'll still have plenty stack to get back in it, but if you hit one of your cards, he is out of there.

You could fold here, but I'd probably gamble a little.

I do know a push here isn't doing anything, he is sticking around regardless.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-02-2005, 11:24 AM
TheBlueMonster TheBlueMonster is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: MD
Posts: 24
Default Re: Standard, yet worth discussing

[ QUOTE ]
possibly 66.

[/ QUOTE ]
seriously doubt it. Naked King is most likely.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-02-2005, 11:33 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Standard, yet worth discussing

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
possibly 66.

[/ QUOTE ]
seriously doubt it. Naked King is most likely.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why would you discount it so quickly? Alot of people like to limp in early position with small pocket pairs, and with a flop with a possible flush draw and a king on it, you wouldn't slowplay a set here. I'm not saying that its the most likely hand, like I said, it also could be AK, KQs, KQo, or KJs. I'd still assume I had all of 11 outs, but if we got all in when another 3 fell and I saw 66, it wouldn't suprise me too much.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.