|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Monday opening bid for PRTY.L : 40?.
Gosh, the underwriters must be really pissed...
The LSE WILL open an investigation this week. IMO. It really looks like someone had been selling a lot of stock prior to all these announcements. Dikshit maybe?. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Monday opening bid for PRTY.L : 40?.
interesting developments
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Monday opening bid for PRTY.L : 40?.
Why do you think this will cause Party's stock price to take a dip?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Monday opening bid for PRTY.L : 40?.
Because I'm short.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Monday opening bid for PRTY.L : 40?.
Sudden 40 % decrease of players in Party Network does not please investors I think.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Monday opening bid for PRTY.L : 40?.
[ QUOTE ]
Sudden 40 % decrease of players in Party Network does not please investors I think. [/ QUOTE ] 40%? I think it's much smaller than that. And that is if NOBODY switches over to party from one of the skins. And the people that were playing the skins but counting towards the number of people on the party network did not contribute much to party's bottom line. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Monday opening bid for PRTY.L : 40?.
Well man, you're a little off on this one, first off it's going to take a while for the LSE to realize that there has been this big of drop off in players. Also pp can do some interesting reporting so no one except the serious investor/player will know what's really going on. Second shareholders/stock price is based on the P/E ratio, not how many players play on it (for the long term). For the short term stock prices are largely based on supply/demand. PP stocks will be more affected by the addition of blackjack then by the breaking up of skins. For your information if you do not currently know the P/E ratio and don't know what a usual gaming stock trades on the LSE DO NOT TRADE YOUR OWN STOCKS, buy mutual funds for the love of GOD!!!!!
discliamer: (I used to daytrade stocks for a living, but DO NOT PM me for advice on stock trading, if I don't know you, I won't give you advice) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Monday opening bid for PRTY.L : 40?.
[ QUOTE ]
Well man, you're a little off on this one, first off it's going to take a while for the LSE to realize that there has been this big of drop off in players. Also pp can do some interesting reporting so no one except the serious investor/player will know what's really going on. Second shareholders/stock price is based on the P/E ratio, not how many players play on it (for the long term). For the short term stock prices are largely based on supply/demand. PP stocks will be more affected by the addition of blackjack then by the breaking up of skins. For your information if you do not currently know the P/E ratio and don't know what a usual gaming stock trades on the LSE DO NOT TRADE YOUR OWN STOCKS, buy mutual funds for the love of GOD!!!!! discliamer: (I used to daytrade stocks for a living, but DO NOT PM me for advice on stock trading, if I don't know you, I won't give you advice) [/ QUOTE ] Party sends out a press release, analysts read it, they do a quick check, see the drop in players, pass along the info. It is already known by people that follow the stock. I have no idea if it will be viewed as a positive or negative. I dont really know how this affects their current and long term profitability. But lets not pretend P/E is the only driver of stock price please. If it were that easy, we would all be rich. But I couldnt agree more with this Buy MUTUAL FUNDS unless you have a lot of experience in the financial markets. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Monday opening bid for PRTY.L : 40?.
[ QUOTE ]
Second shareholders/stock price is based on the P/E ratio [/ QUOTE ] Don't worry, I think I will pass on any stock advice from you. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Monday opening bid for PRTY.L : 40?.
[ QUOTE ]
Sudden 40 % decrease of players in Party Network does not please investors I think. [/ QUOTE ] A decrease in the Party Network sure, but there will undoubtedly be an increase in the number of players on Partypoker.com. As I understand it, their profit margin is far higher on partypoker.com players than on Party Network players. So the real question is if the additional profit created by players switching back to Partypoker.com will make up for the profit lost when players never switch back. What does Party think the answer to that question is? |
|
|