|
View Poll Results: Who do you choose for one night? | |||
randomly selected Ms. OOT contestant | 44 | 91.67% | |
Randomly selected, legal, world class (female) gymnast | 4 | 8.33% | |
Voters: 48. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Table VP$IP
What is the minimum VP$IP table avg you will play at Party on lets say .5/1 full ring?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Table VP$IP
[ QUOTE ]
What is the minimum VP$IP table avg you will play at Party on lets say .5/1 full ring? [/ QUOTE ] I'll play regardless, short or full. If the VPIP is lower, you have to play a bit tighter and steal more (pre and post flop). For me, that's the most fun part of the game, so I'm not too concerned. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] --Dave. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Table VP$IP
I'll play down to 20% if the table features some aggressive players and the pot size stays reasonable. I try to get tables >25%.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Table VP$IP
I leave 2/4 tables if the VPIP gets below 40.
How's that for table selection, bitch! [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Table VP$IP
[ QUOTE ] I leave 2/4 tables if the VPIP gets below 40. [/ QUOTE ] Are you saying you quit poker? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Table VP$IP
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I leave 2/4 tables if the VPIP gets below 40. [/ QUOTE ] Are you saying you quit poker? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] lol Not at all. It's just not worth my time playing at tables with <40 VPIP. I'm getting so picky these days that I won't even sit down with like a 56/12 who only has like 6 bets. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Table VP$IP
I've adjusted my thinking on this a bit. I'm more willing to accept a slightly lower VPIP than I was in the past because I find it so much more difficult to find very good $1-$2 games at PP these days. Even when I find a table that is intitially very good, the turnover is quick and it attracts nothing but rocks (probably 2+2ers). I'd be playing 2 rounds and leaving all day long if I insisted on 30%.
Instead, I focus on the individual players. If there are at least two "very loose" passives or a couple of maniac donators, I'm willing to attempt to divide their money up with a few TAGs and moderate players. I want at least 2 big fish accompanied by not all TAGs. |
|
|