Hasan Habib : Good 4 Poker

Check out his interview on pokertrails.com. His answers on WPT 2005 Championship make a lot of sense. He's humble in victory and graceful in defeat. We need more players like him!

[Beavis68]

Links MAN links!

Go 2 pokertrails.com. Click on Hasan Habib interview.

[m bozeman]

Yeah, he is good for dumping chips to players he has a percentage of.

Read the interview bozeman. Ignorance is bliss but dont be blinded by it. There was some hard poker going on.

[rheaume]

[ QUOTE ]
Read the interview bozeman. Ignorance is bliss but dont be blinded by it. There was some hard poker going on.

[/ QUOTE ]

hard? uh, KJs is an "easy" call when your opponent has 5 bb's.

[ QUOTE ]
Check out his interview on pokertrails.com. His answers on WPT 2005 Championship make a lot of sense. He's humble in victory and graceful in defeat. We need more players like him!

[/ QUOTE ]

very easy to be graceful in defeat when you've got a piece of the guy who finishes 1st

It's not easy to be humble in defeat when all your'e playing for is the title and not the money.

[rheaume]

[ QUOTE ]
It's not easy to be humble in defeat when all your'e playing for is the title and not the money.

[/ QUOTE ]

huh?

I would'nt call it exactly soft play when Hasan raised Tuan Le's BB with 3 4 off suit and then check raised him with no pair no draw when the flop came 8 8 9. At that point Hasan had approx. 9m in chips. The check raise left Tuan with approx. only 2m in chips.

[yaaaflow]

[ QUOTE ]
I would'nt call it exactly soft play when Hasan raised Tuan Le's BB with 3 4 off suit and then check raised him with no pair no draw when the flop came 8 8 9. At that point Hasan had approx. 9m in chips. The check raise left Tuan with approx. only 2m in chips.

[/ QUOTE ]

It doesn't have to influence every decision to influence one decision, and even having it influence one decision is bad enough (from a fairness in tournaments standpoint, anyhow).