Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-04-2004, 12:25 AM
SaintAces SaintAces is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 351
Default Chris Moneymaker is not a fish

discuss.


I personally can't stand the heat he takes and I think he is a fully capable player. any other opinoins?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-04-2004, 12:48 AM
Robk Robk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,242
Default Re: Chris Moneymaker is not a fish

I played with him in stars 2/4 NL (back before 3/6 was spread), although only for a few hours. I thought he was about the third or fourth best player at the table but it was a pretty tough lineup.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-04-2004, 01:54 AM
Ulysses Ulysses is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,519
Default Re: Chris Moneymaker is not a fish

[ QUOTE ]
discuss.
--
I personally can't stand the heat he takes and I think he is a fully capable player. any other opinoins?

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, after talking w/ JA Sucker last night, all I'll say is that Chris might have some work to do on his 20-200 spread limit game.

On a more general level, I've said this before: I don't think anyone is likely to win the WSOP w/ that size field without a fair amount of luck. I also don't think anyone is likely to win the WSOP w/ that size field without a fair amount of skill.

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-04-2004, 03:06 AM
kingstalker kingstalker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 257
Default Re: Chris Moneymaker is not a fish

After he got knocked out of last Sundays 500+30 he played a 300+20 SNG, gank was one of his opponets, he won it playing very solid poker.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-05-2004, 02:53 AM
jayadd jayadd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 193
Default Re: Chris Moneymaker is not a fish

[ QUOTE ]
Well, after talking w/ JA Sucker last night, all I'll say is that Chris might have some work to do on his 20-200 spread limit game.

[/ QUOTE ]

are you kidding me Why on earth would he need work. Anyone of us with an IQ over 30 (Varkoni misses the cut at 28) would enjoy the ability to make what ever mistakes he posibly can. The guy is set for life. He is probably the first WSOP champion or any major tourney winner of 1 million or more who was able to say " this was fun but not what i want to do for a living."
Some people are so fast to become critics when someone succeeds. No one has mentioned Varkoni and his idiotic comments he made that the camera caught. (as you can tell i have issues with varkoni but thats for another time)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-05-2004, 03:16 AM
Ulysses Ulysses is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,519
Default Re: Chris Moneymaker is not a fish

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Well, after talking w/ JA Sucker last night, all I'll say is that Chris might have some work to do on his 20-200 spread limit game.

[/ QUOTE ]

are you kidding me Why on earth would he need work. Anyone of us with an IQ over 30 (Varkoni misses the cut at 28) would enjoy the ability to make what ever mistakes he posibly can. The guy is set for life. He is probably the first WSOP champion or any major tourney winner of 1 million or more who was able to say " this was fun but not what i want to do for a living."
Some people are so fast to become critics when someone succeeds. No one has mentioned Varkoni and his idiotic comments he made that the camera caught. (as you can tell i have issues with varkoni but thats for another time)

[/ QUOTE ]

Huh? What is your point? The guy obviously is interested in playing poker. Why wouldn't he need work on games that he's not terribly good at?

If I recall, the WSOP he won was worth 2M or so. He sold how much of his action, 20%, maybe more? Let's say 20%, that leaves him w/ 1.6M. After taxes that's about 800k. That's a nice chunk of money, but that's just about enough to buy a not terribly nice home around where I live. Of course, that money goes a lot farther in Tennessee, but buy a house, pay some bills, etc. and it would be pretty easy to lose the rest in big poker games. So, yes, if he's going to play high limit poker (and I'm not talking about a little 20-200 spread game), he definitely should work on his game where it needs work.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-05-2004, 10:19 AM
M.B.E. M.B.E. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 1,552
Default Re: Chris Moneymaker is not a fish

[ QUOTE ]
If I recall, the WSOP he won was worth 2M or so. He sold how much of his action, 20%, maybe more? Let's say 20%, that leaves him w/ 1.6M. After taxes that's about 800k.

[/ QUOTE ]
That can't be right; even if the top marginal rate is 50%, surely it doesn't kick in until at least 400K. I always thought that in Canada the tax rate was much higher than in the U.S., but here the top marginal rate (federal and provincial combined) is less than 50%.

Also keep in mind that Nevada (where he earned the money) has no state income tax. I don't know if Moneymaker would have to pay Tennessee state income tax on his win, but I doubt it.

Also I think his gross prize was closer to $2.5M than $2M.

So I don't really know, but I suspect that after taxes he'd be left with considerably more than 800K.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-05-2004, 12:22 PM
Greg (FossilMan) Greg (FossilMan) is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Stonington CT
Posts: 1,920
Default Re: Chris Moneymaker is not a fish

[ QUOTE ]
Also keep in mind that Nevada (where he earned the money) has no state income tax. I don't know if Moneymaker would have to pay Tennessee state income tax on his win, but I doubt it.

[/ QUOTE ]
He will owe Tenn tax. Income tax in the U.S. is based upon your state of residence, AND the state where the money is earned. If Nevada did tax him, he could deduct that amount from what he pays to Tenn, but if Tenn charges more (which it does in this case), he will owe tax to Tenn as well.



[/ QUOTE ]Also I think his gross prize was closer to $2.5M than $2M.

[/ QUOTE ]
From what I recall, it was exactly $2.5M. Also, what I heard is he sold 40% of himself for $4000 before he left Tenn. Half to his Dad and half to a friend. If true, he kept $1.5M, and probably paid about 36-40% of that in income tax (I have no idea how high taxes go in Tenn). He probably kept roughly $900K after taxes.

That's enough to make me happy.

Later, Greg Raymer (FossilMan)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-05-2004, 02:17 PM
mike l. mike l. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: oceanside, california
Posts: 2,212
Default Re: Chris Moneymaker is not a fish

"After taxes that's about 800k. That's a nice chunk of money, but that's just about enough to buy a not terribly nice home around where I live."

i agree. from what i understand it's about how much you keep in your party poker account any given week.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-05-2004, 02:34 PM
Ulysses Ulysses is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,519
Default Re: Chris Moneymaker is not a fish

[ QUOTE ]
"After taxes that's about 800k. That's a nice chunk of money, but that's just about enough to buy a not terribly nice home around where I live."
...
i agree. from what i understand it's about how much you keep in your party poker account any given week.


[/ QUOTE ]

It's about 801k after you paid off my AK like a slot machine last night. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.