Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-24-2005, 09:10 PM
Guy McSucker Guy McSucker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,307
Default Seeing monsters or boxing clever?

Is this clever or stupid? It's a fine line...

Four handed Party $5/10. UTG/CO, who is decent, limps. I raise with two tens on the button. BB calls and UTG limp-reraises. Hmmm. I call and BB calls.

Flop: A T T.

Checked to me, I bet, BB folds and UTG calls.

Turn: 3.

He checks, I bet, he raises, I 3-bet, he caps, I call.

River: A.

He bets. I call.

So? Am I seeing monsters or is this the right play? Or can I fold?

Guy.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-24-2005, 09:25 PM
RunDownHouse RunDownHouse is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 165
Default Re: Seeing monsters or boxing clever?

I would raise before I fold. I think you see a big A go bonkers here often enough, especially 4-handed.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-24-2005, 09:31 PM
skiier04 skiier04 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 45
Default Re: Seeing monsters or boxing clever?

Raise but its close

In my donkish mind
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-24-2005, 09:34 PM
Spartan1983 Spartan1983 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 50
Default Re: Seeing monsters or boxing clever?

If your not going to cap with quads, then yea I think your seeing monsters. He's not slowing down with a fullhouse, bet, if he has AA, tell him NH.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-24-2005, 09:37 PM
JoshuaD JoshuaD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 341
Default Re: Seeing monsters or boxing clever?

[ QUOTE ]
If your not going to cap with quads, then yea I think your seeing monsters. He's not slowing down with a fullhouse, bet, if he has AA, tell him NH.

[/ QUOTE ]

You really think a "decent player" caps on this turn without AA? He could be overplaying AK, but I don't think that accounts for 66% of his holdings (which we'd need to wanna raise this river).
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-24-2005, 10:13 PM
Guy McSucker Guy McSucker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,307
Default Re: Seeing monsters or boxing clever?

[ QUOTE ]
If your not going to cap with quads, then yea I think your seeing monsters. He's not slowing down with a fullhouse, bet, if he has AA, tell him NH.

[/ QUOTE ]

The way I see it, he's told me loud and clear on three streets that he has AA. The question is whether I should listen, and if so, how hard?

Guy.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-24-2005, 10:30 PM
RunDownHouse RunDownHouse is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 165
Default Re: Seeing monsters or boxing clever?

[ QUOTE ]
The way I see it, he's told me loud and clear on three streets that he has AA. The question is whether I should listen, and if so, how hard?

Guy.

[/ QUOTE ]
I think its ok the way it is. Yes, he's decent so its hard to put him on a hand other than AA. I think that goes double when you think about what he thinks you have. PF button raise/no cap can mean a lot of hands, but probably not big PPs or big aces. Flop you bet when checked to, doesn't mean a whole lot. Your turn 3bet defines your hand pretty well though. Its an A, a lone T, or 33. But he caps anyways. This tells me he has AA, a big A, 33, and that's about it.

It breaks down a bit on the river, because he doesn't fear TT - that would be seeing monsters - so he'd lead with any A, figuring its a split at worst and at best you'll misclick/fold.

Given all that, I don't think you're ahead enough to raise here. But I'm no Hellmuth so I call.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-24-2005, 10:44 PM
JoshuaD JoshuaD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 341
Default Re: Seeing monsters or boxing clever?

[ QUOTE ]
But I'm no Hellmuth so I call.

[/ QUOTE ]

Folding here would be terrible. We've got him beat a good percentage of the time. It's just a question of whether we get a value from a raise -- or more clearly, if we're good here > 66% of the time. In this very particular hand, I don't think we have that much of an over.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-25-2005, 07:23 AM
Guy McSucker Guy McSucker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,307
Default Re: Seeing monsters or boxing clever?

[ QUOTE ]

It's just a question of whether we get a value from a raise -- or more clearly, if we're good here > 66% of the time.


[/ QUOTE ]

I see this 66% thing mentioned from time to time and I never understand it. Why does a value raise have to be with a hand that's ahead over two thirds of the time?

Guy.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-25-2005, 08:24 AM
krishanleong krishanleong is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 45
Default Re: Seeing monsters or boxing clever?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If your not going to cap with quads, then yea I think your seeing monsters. He's not slowing down with a fullhouse, bet, if he has AA, tell him NH.

[/ QUOTE ]

The way I see it, he's told me loud and clear on three streets that he has AA. The question is whether I should listen, and if so, how hard?

Guy.

[/ QUOTE ]

You played it perfectly. I wish I would play it that way in your shoes but I'm sure I would raise the river.

Krishan
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.