more interest in videos?

[baronzeus]

would you all watch these videos if we made more?

[sthief09]

si

[SlyGuy]

It's great watching high limit stuff, but i would love to see some more good win rate players playing 3/6 and 5/10. I don't think 10/20+ close enough a game to apply everything we see.

[cookie]

Yes, if single tabling

[baronzeus]

[ QUOTE ]
Yes, if single tabling

[/ QUOTE ]

why is signle table preferred?

[hobbsmann]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Yes, if single tabling

[/ QUOTE ]

why is signle table preferred?

[/ QUOTE ]

I also like what TStone did when he cut out all the boring portions of his session and left the meat. It was kind of hectic as well as hard on the eyes watching 4 tables given the quality.

[Victor]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Yes, if single tabling

[/ QUOTE ]

why is signle table preferred?

[/ QUOTE ]

I also like what TStone did when he cut out all the boring portions of his session and left the meat. It was kind of hectic as well as hard on the eyes watching 4 tables given the quality.

[/ QUOTE ]

there is tons more money *made* during the boring stuff. the *meat* is easy to play and does not factor much into your winrate.

When you don't have lots and lots of hands and read this forum it can be hard to get a good feel about all the small stuff that happen during a session. I have only played 6-max for something like 50-60k hands and think the "boring" stuff is interesting and useful. Granted, when I do have lots and lots of hands I'll probably find it as boring as you do. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[Saborion]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Yes, if single tabling

[/ QUOTE ]

why is signle table preferred?

[/ QUOTE ]
I guess it's because looking at multiple tables is tough when not playing yourself. That shouldn't be a problem for the viewer though, just focus on 1-2 tables and neglect the others.

[SUfan5]

I wouldn't say single table, that would be slow as hell. I think 3 tables would be fine. I did enjoy the video though and would watch more in the future.