|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
He called me a fish
Yes, I got called a fish, which I undoubtedly am, but they usually don't notice.
I thought this was all standard stuff. Anyone think different? Villain is a TAG of the weak variety, but not so weak he won't semibluff. Party $5/10. I have A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] and open raise. The BB defends and we take the flop heads up. Flop: 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] He check-raises my autobet and I call getting 7-1. Turn: 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] He bets. I call getting 5-1. The rest is easy: I hit the 9 and manage to put a few bets in on the river before getting called a fish. So did I do anything fishy or not? Guy. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: He called me a fish
Looks good to me. Did you get villain to do more than bet-call the river?
You know that most people who call other players fish aren't particularly good. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: He called me a fish
Standard, sometimes I 3-bet the flop if the c/r can be a draw
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: He called me a fish
The turn is close depending on villain.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: He called me a fish
[ QUOTE ]
The turn is close depending on villain. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] What range of hands do you put him on? I have a very hard time coming up with a range that gives us less than 1/3 pot equity. My guess is that against the average TAG we have about 40% pot equity here. I don't think the turn call is close at all. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: He called me a fish
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] The turn is close depending on villain. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] What range of hands do you put him on? I have a very hard time coming up with a range that gives us less than 1/3 pot equity. My guess is that against the average TAG we have about 40% pot equity here. I don't think the turn call is close at all. [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Villain is a TAG of the weak variety, but not so weak he won't semibluff. [/ QUOTE ] So I'm curious what your range is. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: He called me a fish
Yeah, 40% seems way too high to me.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: He called me a fish
[ QUOTE ]
So I'm curious what your range is. [/ QUOTE ] Not taking into account diamond draws, this is my range (of course including diamond draws we would have even more equity than this): 66+, A9s-A6s, KTs-K6s, Q6s+, J7s+, T7s+, 97s+, 87s, ATo-A6o, KTo-K7o, QTo-Q8o, J8o+, T9o And against that range I have us at 42.9% equity. I don't see why this is such a stretch? I certainly can't see any range for the TAG that makes the turn call "close." Even if he is weak. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: He called me a fish
Are you planning on showing down UI though? Because if he's betting a large percentage of this range on the river, the fact that we're ahead of king high or something is not very relevant if you're folding to a river bet.
FWIW, obviously he's not betting these hands every time, or maybe even close to everytime, on the river (does he have KTs here though??). I think once you factor in this turn call as a "free-showdown call" some portion of the time you can definitely make it. My point was just that your actual equity here is misleading. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: He called me a fish
I disagree with a good amount of your range.
Here is my quick pokerstove, I included some small inconsistencies to weight: equity (%) win (%) / tie (%) Hand 1: 63.8068 % [ 00.60 00.04 ] { JJ-44, ATs-A5s, KQs, KTs-K5s, QTs-Q6s, JTs-J7s, T9s-T7s, 98s-97s, 87s-86s, 76s, A9o-A5o, K9o-K7o, Q9o-Q7o, JTo-J8o, T9o-T8o, 98o, 87o } Hand 2: 36.1932 % [ 00.33 00.04 ] { AcTd } |
|
|