|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ROI: Standard to include Rakeback or not?
When discussing ROI is it standard to refer to your true ROI after rakeback or figure it with the full juice?
I appolgize if this has already been discussed, I could not a thread on it. [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ROI: Standard to include Rakeback or not?
without
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ROI: Standard to include Rakeback or not?
[ QUOTE ]
without [/ QUOTE ] |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ROI: Standard to include Rakeback or not?
[ QUOTE ]
When discussing ROI is it standard to refer to your true ROI after rakeback or figure it with the full juice? I appolgize if this has already been discussed, I could not a thread on it. [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] 2+2 Standard Formula for Calculating/Reporting R.O.I.: 1.) Think of a number that has a nice "ring"; e.g.17% 2.) Tell everyone that you have a 17.2% R.O.I. over 4000 SnG's. 3.) Create a Web-Site & charge for SnG advice 4.) Write a Blog 5.) Dodge any objective test of your R.O.I.-producing ability 6.) Always add twice your imaginary rakeback to total winnings before calculating imaginary R.O.I. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ROI: Standard to include Rakeback or not?
roi should include rakeback since that is part of your return on investment
however, because not everyone gets rakeback and different people get different %s of rakeback, we don't include it in our figures in order to keep all of them on a standard platform plus, we are discussing the results of our play and how it goes up and down with different techniques, tilt, variance, etc...while rakeback remains constant |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|