|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
AQs, min-raises against a semi-LAG. Line check?
2-4 6 handed. Hero is in MP with AQ clubs, Villian is behind him with 500. Hero has 400 behind.
EP limps, Hero raises to 18, Villian calls, Blinds fold, limper folds. Flop: Q22, two spades. Hero bets 30, Villian raises to 60, Hero calls. Turn: 4 spades. Hero bets 80, Villian raises to 160, Hero's Line? Should I have turn-check raised instead? It probably gets me more value/same value from a Q and maybe gets 2 to fold sometime. I figure a hand like QK or QJ will likely check behind river 1/5th of the time if it spades out or just because if a bad card comes (ten). The chances of him having a high spade or him checking behind just because nullify each other. Should turn-check raising be a better line? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AQs, min-raises against a semi-LAG. Line check?
[ QUOTE ]
2-4 6 handed. Hero is in MP with AQ clubs, Villian is behind him with 500. Hero has 400 behind. EP limps, Hero raises to 18, Villian calls, Blinds fold, limper folds. Flop: Q22, two spades. Hero bets 30, Villian raises to 60, Hero calls. Turn: 4 spades. Hero bets 80, Villian raises to 160, Hero's Line? Should I have turn-check raised instead? It probably gets me more value/same value from a Q and maybe gets 2 to fold sometime. I figure a hand like QK or QJ will likely check behind river 1/5th of the time if it spades out or just because if a bad card comes (ten). The chances of him having a high spade or him checking behind just because nullify each other. Should turn-check raising be a better line? [/ QUOTE ] Id check/call turn for pot control. Evaluate on river. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|