|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
That LAP fiend....
Villan is LAP. 30/5 with a total of .7...
I am wondering what's the best way to play a hand like this. Out of position against a known LAG, heads up. Note: I wanted to checkraise the turn but didn't. Party Poker 5/10 Hold'em (10 handed) converter Preflop: Hero is BB with A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 raises</font>, <font color="#666666">7 folds</font>, Hero calls. Flop: (4.40 SB) 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 bets</font>, Hero calls. Turn: (3.20 BB) 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 bets</font>, Hero calls. River: (5.20 BB) 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, UTG+1 calls. Final Pot: 7.20 BB Alternate ways to play this hand greatly appreciated. Haupt_234 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: That LAG fiend....
30/5? Since when is 30/5/.7 a LAG?
Anyway, given a preflop call, which I wouldn't do unless you messed up the stats, I'd play this hand exactly the same way. This is the way-ahead-way-behind line, and you used it perfectly. Rob |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: That LAG fiend....
[ QUOTE ]
30/5? Since when is 30/5/.7 a LAG? [/ QUOTE ] Oops. I meant LAP. I'll change it. Haupt_234 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: That LAG fiend....
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 30/5? Since when is 30/5/.7 a LAG? [/ QUOTE ] Oops. I meant LAP. I'll change it. Haupt_234 [/ QUOTE ] LP-P, you mean? Only raises 5% of his hands? Anyway, check-call, check-call, bet is perfect for this situation. What didn't you like about it? Rob |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: That LAG fiend....
[ QUOTE ]
LP-P, you mean? Only raises 5% of his hands? Anyway, check-call, check-call, bet is perfect for this situation. What didn't you like about it? [/ QUOTE ] Somehow, my ranges lable 5% PFR as aggro... idk. The thing I didn't like about it was that I thought I could get more money out of him, since I should have only been afraid of AK and AQ... Haupt_234 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: That LAG fiend....
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] LP-P, you mean? Only raises 5% of his hands? Anyway, check-call, check-call, bet is perfect for this situation. What didn't you like about it? [/ QUOTE ] Somehow, my ranges lable 5% PFR as aggro... idk. The thing I didn't like about it was that I thought I could get more money out of him, since I should have only been afraid of AK and AQ... Haupt_234 [/ QUOTE ] Dude, 5% is passive. Dunno where you got aggro from that. A 5% raiser is raising AK, AQ, AJs, and AA-TT here. Rob |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: That LAG fiend....
As I think through it, you might want to raise pre-flop. If he's truly LAG, I'd raise pre-flop. Check-raise the flop and lead out on the turn. I'd feel very confident I've got the best of it the whole way and keep pushing....
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: That LAG fiend....
bet flop, bet turn, check-call river
if your flop bet was raised, then call flop raise, check-call turn and river |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: That LAG fiend....
[ QUOTE ]
bet flop, bet turn, check-call river if your flop bet was raised, then call flop raise, check-call turn and river [/ QUOTE ] I think I like my line of play better, since checking the river will allow the opponent to showdown cheaply with a weak ace and a lower pocket pair. He is unlikely to raise my river bet even with AK or AQ, so there isn't much risk involved. I would pay a bet on the river anyway, and I don't want my opponent to check through a weaker hand. Haupt_234 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: That LAP fiend....
He's really not that aggressive preflop and I think this is a muck for me from the BB. If I didn't, though, I'd play it the same.
Kludde |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|