#1
|
|||
|
|||
weird river push... call??
***** Hand History for Game 2992816933 *****
$200 NL Texas Hold'em - Sunday, November 06, 18:20:41 EDT 2005 Table Table 65338 (6 max) (No DP) (Real Money) Seat 2 is the button Total number of players : 6 Seat 1: xraymanmd ( $153.80 ) Seat 2: NiRRRR ( $241.60 ) Seat 5: KPARKY ( $228.30 ) Seat 6: MysteryDen ( $238.73 ) Seat 3: EarnW3Hands ( $215.10 ) Seat 4: paragator ( $224.30 ) EarnW3Hands posts small blind [$1]. paragator posts big blind [$2]. ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to NiRRRR [ 8s 7s ] KPARKY folds. MysteryDen calls [$2]. xraymanmd folds. NiRRRR raises [$8]. >You have options at Table 69118 (6 max) (No DP) Table!. EarnW3Hands folds. paragator calls [$6]. >You have options at Table 68965 (6 max) (No DP) Table!. MysteryDen folds. ** Dealing Flop ** [ 8d, 9c, 3s ] paragator checks. NiRRRR bets [$12]. paragator calls [$12]. ** Dealing Turn ** [ 6s ] >You have options at Table 69118 (6 max) (No DP) Table!. paragator checks. >You have options at Table 68965 (6 max) (No DP) Table!. >You have options at Table 69118 (6 max) (No DP) Table!. NiRRRR bets [$35]. paragator calls [$35]. ** Dealing River ** [ 2c ] paragator is all-In [$169.30] nirrrr???? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: weird river push... call??
No. Villain was slowplaying something which has you crushed.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: weird river push... call??
Barring some sort of super read on a villain making this play with missed overs or 10J, I don't really see how you can call this. I don't think your 8 is good here. Fold.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: weird river push... call??
At this level and below the overbet is almost never a bluff ime. Insta-fold.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: weird river push... call??
no, easy fold
and check the turn |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: weird river push... call??
[ QUOTE ]
and check the turn [/ QUOTE ] Betting this turn is bad with a OESD and flush draw? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: weird river push... call??
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] and check the turn [/ QUOTE ] Betting this turn is bad with a OESD and flush draw? [/ QUOTE ] yes and no. checking is better. |
|
|