Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Science, Math, and Philosophy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-25-2005, 07:44 PM
lotus776 lotus776 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 11
Default for the math majors, fun with triangles

Given fourteen points draw equidistant to each other in the shape of a pyramid missing the top piece (5 bottom row, 4 the row above, 3 the row above that and finally two on the row above that which is the top), determine the number of triangles that can be drawn formed with the vertices at these points.
the picture should look like Pascals Triangle without the top point . I don't know how to draw the image of the dots properly on this website. Imagine 14 dots arranged in a pyramid without a top piece. Please give a brief explanation. good luck, have fun!

-Brent

hint: the answer is a prime number and is not 329, this is a statistics problem, the triangles do not have to be equilateral
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-25-2005, 08:14 PM
JoshuaD JoshuaD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 341
Default Re: for the math majors, fun with triangles

<font class="small">Code:</font><hr /><pre>
@ @
@ @ @
@ @ @ @
@ @ @ @ @
</pre><hr />
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-25-2005, 09:48 PM
lotus776 lotus776 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 11
Default Re: for the math majors, fun with triangles

yes, that picture is correct
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-25-2005, 10:36 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: for the math majors, fun with triangles

ugh, was doing this and realized you said the triangles didn't need to be equilateral...back to step 1.

EDIT:
Does this have to do with the Euler thingy?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-27-2005, 06:16 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: for the math majors, fun with triangles

Did you forget about us? more hints please I can't solve it...am I right with saying it has to do with Eulers thingy?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-27-2005, 07:45 PM
Siegmund Siegmund is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 415
Default Re: for the math majors, fun with triangles

When you posted this problem last week, two different methods of arriving at 329 were posted.

Could you kindly tell us what the flaw was with those? I'm sure I am not the only one who has independently reproduced 329 as an answer.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.