Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-21-2005, 03:28 PM
Ghazban Ghazban is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1
Default A no-read blind battle hand

Assume no reads; feel free to comment on any and all streets.

Party Skins Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $2 BB (6 max, 5 handed) converter

MP ($277.65)
Button ($134.65)
Hero ($203.70)
BB ($61.69)
UTG ($197.70)

Preflop: Hero is SB with J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. Hero posts a blind of $1.
<font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero (poster) raises to $6</font>, BB calls $4.

Flop: ($12) 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
Hero checks, BB checks.

Turn: ($12) 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $8</font>, <font color="#CC3333">BB raises to $25</font>, Hero calls $17.

River: ($62) Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $31</font>
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-21-2005, 03:30 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: A no-read blind battle hand

This is an ok line IMO

edit: hmm, didn't notice he was shortstacked. I would rather have bet the flop so I can push the turn
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-21-2005, 03:33 PM
stu-unger stu-unger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: bluffing calling stations
Posts: 284
Default Re: A no-read blind battle hand

i dont really like doing this against a short stack.

the hand looks fine as long as the river is a blocker...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-21-2005, 03:35 PM
Ghazban Ghazban is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1
Default Re: A no-read blind battle hand

[ QUOTE ]
i dont really like doing this against a short stack.

the hand looks fine as long as the river is a blocker...

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, if he calls all-in and raises some more, I'll fold and move to a site that uses table stakes rules.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-21-2005, 03:37 PM
stu-unger stu-unger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: bluffing calling stations
Posts: 284
Default Re: A no-read blind battle hand

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i dont really like doing this against a short stack.

the hand looks fine as long as the river is a blocker...

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, if he calls all-in and raises some more, I'll fold and move to a site that uses table stakes rules.

[/ QUOTE ]

wow i suck at life... it looks fine to me...

edit- what is the benefit to leading the river? after thinking about it i think that c/c the river may be the better line, but im not sure...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-21-2005, 06:30 PM
orange orange is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 82
Default Re: A no-read blind battle hand

I like it..if you put him on a weaker K, you may consider c/c-ing the river if he will stab at it. If he had a FD, he played it very strange.

I like leading the entire way.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.