Ann Coulter is a Stupid Bitch

[Iplayboard]

Do conservatives even like her? She's just so mean and makes rediculous statements and generalizations without qualifying her opinion. For example, she said that liberals support eugenics, to which Bill O'Reilly replied "I don't think so." Maybe everytime I watch her she's having her period, I don't know.

[whiskeytown]

there's a whole chapter in Al Franken's book "Big fat lies and the lying liars who tell them" that just rips a new [censored] into her shoddy research...

He points out quotes she makes from sources, goes to the sources and finds out she either made up a whole new meaning for the statement (the original didn't back her viewpoint) and some of her stuff was just about outright fabricated - like the [censored] almost didn't exist except in her mind.

I highly recommend picking it up.

EDIT: - I just realized I spelled her last name wrong in a post I just did - guess it wasn't important enough for me to get right - [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

RB

[[censored]]

Wait so you're going to rip Al Coulter but cite Al Franklin? This doesn't seem a wee bit hypocritical to you?

[whiskeytown]

the issue isn't being partisan - it's using false and manufactured facts to make an argument - Ann Coulter does it, Al Franken doesn't - I didn't see Ann offer any refutation other then to probably threaten to kill all SNL alumni and convert them to Christianity. (oh wait, that was the entire MIDDLE EAST - sorry...)

if you can't see the difference, you're as worthless as the word your name blocks out.

RB

[[censored]]

[ QUOTE ]
the issue isn't being partisan - it's using false and manufactured facts to make an argument - Ann Coulter does it, Al Franken doesn't -

if you can't see the difference, you're as worthless as the word your name blocks out.

RB

[/ QUOTE ]

So what is it exactly you are saying about Al Franklin?

[whiskeytown]

the fact is this...

he wrote a well researched chapter on the manufactured lies of Ann Coulter - a person who is the primary subject of this topic.

He did well informed research, documented, and put it in his book. Ann did nothing and neither have you to refute this.

Egro, she really is a stupid bitch - LOL - to base her arguments on false quotes and talking points is tantamount to admitting her claims and opinions are false too -

actually, you don't contribute anything worthwhile at all to this forum or any discussion, do you....

starting to get that feeling when someone ignorant is wasting my time

*** you are ignoring [censored] ***

RB

[Matty]

[ QUOTE ]
Wait so you're going to rip Al Coulter but cite Al Franklin? This doesn't seem a wee bit hypocritical to you?

[/ QUOTE ]Absolutely not. Just because two people occupy the same positions on different sides does not make them equal.

Ann Coulter is filth; vermin not fit to lick my shoes. She's either totally [censored] bat-[censored] crazy or morally a sick monster. She is the worst person I've ever personally met. The number of people I genuinely hate can be counted on one hand, and she makes the list. Her listeners I can only manage to feel sorry for.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Wait so you're going to rip Al Coulter but cite Al Franklin? This doesn't seem a wee bit hypocritical to you?

[/ QUOTE ]Absolutely not. Just because two people occupy the same positions on different sides does not make them equal.

Ann Coulter is filth; vermin not fit to lick my shoes. She's either totally [censored] bat-[censored] crazy or morally a sick monster. She is the worst person I've ever personally met. The number of people I genuinely hate can be counted on one hand, and she makes the list. Her listeners I can only manage to feel sorry for.

[/ QUOTE ]

This may be true but she's photogenic, articulate and gets ratings.

[SheetWise]

Ann did reply to Franken. Coulter.

Here's another Link.

[Cyrus]

And quite ignorant too, even of matters that are common knowledge. (Such as her astonishing claim that Canadian soldiers fought in Vietnam, uttered on live TV. A fine TV moment.)

What you call Coulter's "reply to Franken" is just that : a reply. Nothing of substance. If you are accused of being a thief and evidence is presented to that effect, if you reply with a thousand-word document without addressing the accusation head on, without refuting the evidence, then yes, you "have replied" -- but that does not mean the accusations were addressed.

Ann Coulter has been accused in Al Franken's book of being an almost pathological liar (perhaps more accurately would be the term a professional liar). And this is claimed with some pretty strong evidence in Franken's book! (How about using as evidence Coulter's own book? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] Where she directs readers, for example, to a footnote that supposedly backs up one of her claims, except that the footnote is not referencing any source but is more "opinion" -- or does not exist at all!) I have read Franken's book and all the "replies" of Coulter I could find and she has nothing to counter Franken with. So she keeps mostly mum -- or writes up op-ed pieces like that fluff you linked to.

Ann Coulter does not "bother" me. I wish the Right had more of her. I wish there were a thousand Coulters. That would make the job much easier.

Some neo-cons I know are bothered by Coulter. They wanna bed her -- seriously. For some weird reason, they find her sexy.