|
|
#1
10-01-2005, 11:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Going back to limit
It was fun playing some SNGs and learning the game a bit.
I will definately come back to them later for a bit of a break. As a main game though I found it a bit too robotic, not really enough time to take advantage of extremely weak players. [Insert few pages of how this forum sucks] <-- cant be bothered. I'm sure the forum nazis will find someone else to flame after I'm gone. Thanks to the few who actually posted something useful. Bye 
|
|
#2
10-01-2005, 12:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Going back to limit
Whoever made the helpmeout account got bored with him, it seems.
|
|
#3
10-01-2005, 02:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Going back to limit
[ QUOTE ]
As a main game though I found it a bit too robotic, not really enough time to take advantage of extremely weak players. [/ QUOTE ] And limit is not robotic? You are a moron there's sooooooooooo many opportunities to take advantage of the weak players.
|
|
#4
10-01-2005, 03:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Going back to limit
hmmmmm, what two words (that wont get censored) spring to mind?
bubble play. aside from 7stud hi/lo, limit is the most mathmatical, robotic game popular on poker sites now.
|
|
#5
10-01-2005, 09:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Going back to limit
[ QUOTE ]
hmmmmm, what two words (that wont get censored) spring to mind? bubble play. aside from 7stud hi/lo, limit is the most mathmatical, robotic game popular on poker sites now. [/ QUOTE ] I wish 7cs8ob was popular. I could make a killing if there were one tenth the number of fish that are playing hold em.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
