Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-13-2005, 07:39 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default was this a bad laydown?

My hand converter is broken. Can i get some feedback on what you guys think about me laying this hand down preflop? Was a 5.50 sng on ub turbo. Wide range of hands from both players so far. Very Loose aggressive.
Hand #8359082-25 at TurboSnG-0010i (No Limit Hold'em Sit and Go)
Powered by UltimateBet
Started at 13/Sep/05 19:28:03

Villian is at seat 1 with 2305.
meekmeister is at seat 2 with 675.
tyinflies is at seat 3 with 5990.
HERO is at seat 4 with 1240.
Snoofer is at seat 6 with 1890.
slappy9520 is at seat 7 with 865.
umkid is at seat 8 with 2035.
The button is at seat 3.

HERO posts the small blind of 50.
Snoofer posts the big blind of 100.

AN3667: -- --
meekmeister: -- --
tyinflies: -- --
HERO: Ks Ah
Snoofer: -- --
slappy9520: -- --
umkid: -- --

Pre-flop:

slappy9520 goes all-in for 865. umkid folds. AN3667
calls. meekmeister folds. tyinflies folds.
HERO folds. Snoofer folds.

Tournament all-in showdown -- players show:

AN3667 shows Kh Qc.
slappy9520 shows Qh 6h.


Flop (board: 3s Jc 3d):

(no action in this round)


Turn (board: 3s Jc 3d 3c):

(no action in this round)


River (board: 3s Jc 3d 3c 4s):

(no action in this round)




Showdown:

AN3667 has Kh Qc 3s 3d 3c: three threes.
slappy9520 has Qh 3s Jc 3d 3c: three threes.


Hand #8359082-25 Summary:

No rake is taken for this hand.
AN3667 wins 1880 with three threes.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-13-2005, 08:03 PM
hyde hyde is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 7
Default Re: was this a bad laydown?

I do indeed believe this was a bad laydown.
I suspect this will be confirmed by posters using words that make "bad laydown" seem kind.

you are short
he is shorter
you have a very good hand
oops! just re-read and noticed the big stack called...
I still push. Triple up and win the thing or start another.
The big stack is calling with a wide range because he knows the shorty is pushing with a wide range.
I think you are in good shape.

I bet your kings would have won it....... [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-13-2005, 08:28 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: was this a bad laydown?

I don't think it was a bad laydown. (I don't think pushing would be horrible though).

While AK is damn strong especially with an M of ~8, I want it heads up. You have the button next and a round of hands to potentially be first in the pot (even though you may not see a hand as good as AK). Although the villans were LAG (and by the results, donkish), even best-case scenario and you have them both dominated, you are about a 55% favorite to win the hand. Your pot-odds were about 2:1 which justify a call/push but i don't think the laydown was horrible.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-13-2005, 08:32 PM
Fatdogs12 Fatdogs12 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 60
Default Re: was this a bad laydown?

I think a call here would be horrible. You have 12 bbs and a caller of an all in. Hey AK is great but you can't call this.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.