|
|
#1
09-13-2005, 01:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
comparing low limit games on different sites
So I've been reading the "reviews" of sites on BW and they do a comparative rating of the softness of games.
The 1/2 and 2/4 games on the party network are rated A- (good) The 1/2 and 2/4 games on the poker network are rated C and C+ (very bad comparatively). I know that the poker network isn't very popular, but does anyone have any supporting evidence that shows that it is infact easier to win on party than it is on the poker network (Pokerroom, hollywood, etc)? 
|
|
#2
09-13-2005, 02:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: comparing low limit games on different sites
Pokerroom has the atrocious rake at 2/4, so that makes the game really tough to squeeze out a profit. The 1/2 full games are garbage because of the micro games. The 1/2 full were the softest games I have ever seen until that point online. I think Pokerroom readjusted their rake at 1/2......
|
|
#3
09-13-2005, 02:24 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: comparing low limit games on different sites
[ QUOTE ]
Pokerroom has the atrocious rake at 2/4, so that makes the game really tough to squeeze out a profit. The 1/2 full games are garbage because of the micro games. The 1/2 full were the softest games I have ever seen until that point online. I think Pokerroom readjusted their rake at 1/2...... [/ QUOTE ] The 1/2 full were the softest games until what point? I find many good 1/2 games on PR, but they're very TAG at 2/4 and 3/6, not to mention the new rake makes an additional 0.4BB/100 winrate cut. Bottom line is that party is an easier network to win on, yes? At least easier to find good games on because of the traffic. If I want to 8-10 table, do I have to play several skins at a time?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
