Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-02-2005, 12:44 PM
foldem foldem is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 81
Default JJ UTG+1

2/4 6max, button seems reasonable.
me 550
button 450

i get JJ UTG+1 and raise to 20 after a loose limper, button calls, fishy BB calls, limper calls. so 4 of us to the flop:

T 5 2r

i bet 75, button flat calls other two fold. turn is the 7c putting a two flush on board i check-fold to a bet of 180. standard or am i seeing monsters under the bed?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-02-2005, 01:02 PM
emil3000 emil3000 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 100
Default Re: JJ UTG+1

Too weak IMO. You're still ahead to so many hands that he would play this way. I can see check calling and leading river. Or maybe ccing river too...
Betting is standard and works of course. I was just thinking that ccing might be better, cause I see fairly little chance of this turn getting checked through if you check. (( and similar pairs will bet to protect, most likely, but would have folded to a bet. AT will also bet, but would fold to a bet. A set and QQ-AA will bet of course, but these are the least likely hands your opponent might hold. T9s and similar hands could perhaps check, but if this guy is a little aggro they own't...
Is this good thinking?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-02-2005, 01:10 PM
foldem foldem is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 81
Default Re: JJ UTG+1

What range of hands do you put the button on? I feel like AT is the only hand he could have that I am ahead of. When he flat called with two people yet to act, I thought a set was very likely. I don't think check calling and leading the river is an option as i will be committed to the pot, I think my options are check raise all in, bet fold or check fold.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-02-2005, 01:37 PM
emil3000 emil3000 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 100
Default Re: JJ UTG+1

I think he calls with a lot more hands... That's just me though. Checkraise all in is fine IMO.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-02-2005, 01:53 PM
ajmargarine ajmargarine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pwning Robby Gordon
Posts: 798
Default Re: JJ UTG+1

[ QUOTE ]
I think he calls with a lot more hands... That's just me though. Checkraise all in is fine IMO.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't like the c/r on the turn. I would rather lead because he has to be concerned that you have AA/KK, or at least an overpair. So if he knows that and still raises the turn, you can get away from the hand, because you are probably beat. Drawless board, shave a tad off your flop bet, so your turn bet can be a bit smaller.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-02-2005, 02:03 PM
emil3000 emil3000 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 100
Default Re: JJ UTG+1

Well, yeah, you can get away from the hand when you're beat. Conversely your opponents get away from their hands when you got them beat... I think that's the case most of the time... What handrange do you give villain? Which of those hands do you think he will bet? I think villains handrange consists mostly of hands that hero beats, and that he will bet almost all of them, but would fold to another bet. Therefore I think a checkraise is the best option.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-02-2005, 02:17 PM
ajmargarine ajmargarine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pwning Robby Gordon
Posts: 798
Default Re: JJ UTG+1

A c/r loses the most if villian has Hero beat and is basically gambooling. A c/f maybe folds the best hand. Nothing wrong with betting and folding out a worse villian hand and taking the pot right there and moving on.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-02-2005, 02:31 PM
foldem foldem is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 81
Default Re: JJ UTG+1

I think a decent player will usually check behind hands like 89, AT, KT etc. on the turn. As for the range of hands I think it has to be ATo, ATs-JTs, TT, 77, 22, JJ-AA, 89s. There is no way he is going to call a big bet on the flop with worse than top pair or a good draw with two players yet to act. This guy hadn't done anything to make me believe he would over commit to top pair or worse so I checked intending to fold to a reasonable bet. If he checked behind I was going to value/block the river.

I do like the idea of betting 3/4 pot on the drawless flop so I can bet less on the turn and fold to a raise. This line might occasionally even fold a scared QQ.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.