Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Waiting for Big Blind
Yes 19 55.88%
No 15 44.12%
Voters: 34. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-01-2005, 02:23 PM
lonn19 lonn19 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 69
Default If you had to choose...

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-01-2005, 03:13 PM
lozen lozen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 125
Default Re: If you had to choose...

I actually dont mide the ESPN guys.What do you guys want Ryan Seacrest, Oprah ? Who would you rather have.

You should include the dudes from the European Tour too.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-01-2005, 03:18 PM
Bartman387 Bartman387 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 298
Default Re: If you had to choose...

[ QUOTE ]
What do you guys want Ryan Seacrest, Oprah ?

[/ QUOTE ]

No, but I don't want someone who tells the same ex-wfie joke 3 times in a show, my god how many times can you hear the same 3 one-liners?

The WPT guys, while kind of cliched at times, do a hood job at being entertaining while at the same time giving insight into what is going on, neither of which is given on the ESPN broadcasts. I would also say that every show of the Ultimate POker Challenge i announced much better than ESPN broadcasts as well.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-01-2005, 03:33 PM
illegit illegit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 217
Default Re: If you had to choose...

[ QUOTE ]

The WPT guys, while kind of cliched at times, do a hood job at being entertaining while at the same time giving insight into what is going on, neither of which is given on the ESPN broadcasts.

[/ QUOTE ]
Exactly. Van patten is pretty entertaining and Sexton is very good at keeping viewers informed as to what is actually happening in the hand, often indicating the bet size in relation to the pot, the significance of a particular play etc.

Absolutely PWN the ESPN clowns.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-01-2005, 03:49 PM
TransientR TransientR is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 0
Default Re: If you had to choose...

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

The WPT guys, while kind of cliched at times, do a hood job at being entertaining while at the same time giving insight into what is going on, neither of which is given on the ESPN broadcasts.

[/ QUOTE ]
Exactly. Van patten is pretty entertaining and Sexton is very good at keeping viewers informed as to what is actually happening in the hand, often indicating the bet size in relation to the pot, the significance of a particular play etc.

Absolutely PWN the ESPN clowns.

[/ QUOTE ]

And the WPT trys to keep track of the blind levels, pot size and stack sizes. ESPN forgets about those minor details for long stretches [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Van Patten is goofy, but I've never understood some of the hostility Sexton gets, I think he does a good job pointing out relevant aspects of a hand (because he is a good poker player).

Honestly, the announcers don't mean that much to me, just show blind level, stack sizes, bet sizes and total amount in the pot, all I need to enjoy the play.

If they would show every hand at a final table, that would be Nirvana, but unlikely to ever happen.

Frank
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-01-2005, 04:42 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: If you had to choose...

Norman Chad on a WSOP broadcast is like John Madden in the Madden NFL video games. Even if you're not a fan of him, his lines make for great ammo in casual conversations with friends.

Playing Madden with a friend: (Friend's name) was waiting for something to develop, and BOOM! He got developed!

Poker home game: It's so quiet in here, you can almost hear (friend's name) telling himself "I'm the best player at this table."
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-01-2005, 03:52 PM
Grisgra Grisgra is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 715
Default Re: If you had to choose...

It is extremely disturbing to hear Vince Van Patten referred to as "entertaining" not once, but twice in this thread.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-01-2005, 03:55 PM
lozen lozen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 125
Default Re: If you had to choose...

Let me add I would pick the two guys from the European Poker Tour as the one is really knowledgable and the other entertaining. I agree the wife jokes do get stale after a while
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-01-2005, 08:30 PM
2+2 wannabe 2+2 wannabe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: getting pwned in challenge
Posts: 1,384
Default Re: If you had to choose...

[ QUOTE ]
Let me add I would pick the two guys from the European Poker Tour as the one is really knowledgable and the other entertaining.

[/ QUOTE ]

absolutely agree
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-01-2005, 03:58 PM
jeffraider jeffraider is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 27
Default Re: If you had to choose...

If only there was a Chris Rose/Howard Lederer option. . .
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.