750 hand check up!

Buccaneer · #1 08-08-2005, 01:08 PM

I know I am going to get reamed for this but these are my poker office stats. I know that this is to small of a sample to get any info that you would base big decisions on. I do not care if you flame me as long as you tell me what you think. I do think that the sample is big enough to identify if I have some huge issues I need to deal with right now.

The # of winning hands from the different positions seems to be rather linear except for the button. Whats up with that? Is this normal? I would think that this position would be my biggest winner but it is a looser. Another flag that I see is that the BB is my second best position for % of hands won and my highest % of flops seen and my best money maker. I am now saving up for Poker Tracker. I know that PO is not the main tool around here but it was a freebie from a bonus.

BatsShadow · #2 08-08-2005, 01:13 PM

I'm afraid I'm going to get reamed just for replying.

1) What level are you playing at?
2) Who cares about 1), I think the only thing that you can pull out of these stats is that your saw-flop looks way too high for any limit.
3) PLAY MORE HANDS!

deception5 · #3 08-08-2005, 01:17 PM

It's hard to see for sure because it's such a small sample size but I'd say you're playing too many hands as it looks like you're seeing the flop over 25% of the time in any position. It would also be useful to see your preflop raise %, but i don't know how this works in pokeroffice.

Webster · #4 08-08-2005, 01:19 PM

Well - you obviously know that 40 hands in one position is about 960 short of being on the very very outside of valid.

You saw about twice as many hands as you should. and now - we will let this post sink into the anals of 2+2 never to be found. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

bozlax · #5 08-08-2005, 01:20 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I'm afraid I'm going to get reamed just for replying.

1) What level are you playing at?
2) Who cares about 1), I think the only thing that you can pull out of these stats is that your saw-flop looks way too high for any limit.
3) PLAY MORE HANDS!

[/ QUOTE ]

Uh, aren't 2 and 3 contradictory?

bozlax · #6 08-08-2005, 01:24 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I do not care if you flame me as long as you tell me what you think.

[/ QUOTE ]

All I can think at the moment is that I want to flame you.

baronzeus · #7 08-08-2005, 01:26 PM

I played 2000 hands yesterday and lost $120. But I'm a winning player overall. Do you see what I'm trying to say?

Aaron W. · #8 08-08-2005, 01:27 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I know I am going to get reamed for this but these are my poker office stats. I know that this is to small of a sample to get any info that you would base big decisions on. I do not care if you flame me as long as you tell me what you think. I do think that the sample is big enough to identify if I have some huge issues I need to deal with right now.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think...

[ QUOTE ]
that this is to small of a sample to get any info that you would base big decisions on.

[/ QUOTE ]

I also think 750 hands is not...

[ QUOTE ]
big enough to identify if I have some huge issues I need to deal with right now.

[/ QUOTE ]

baronzeus · #9 08-08-2005, 01:31 PM

By the way, you are seeing way way too many flops here. And you are running extremely hot. Winning 16% of pots 10 handed is absurd.

ltb · #10 08-08-2005, 01:51 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm afraid I'm going to get reamed just for replying.

1) What level are you playing at?
2) Who cares about 1), I think the only thing that you can pull out of these stats is that your saw-flop looks way too high for any limit.
3) PLAY MORE HANDS!

[/ QUOTE ]

Uh, aren't 2 and 3 contradictory?

[/ QUOTE ]

3 is referring to the fact that 750 is too small of a sample, so he needs to play more hands.