#1
|
|||
|
|||
QQ underpair vs shortstack 5/10
shortstack is unknown, in fact this is the only hand we've ever played together.
three limp to me on button, i make it 65 with black QQ, SB (400) calls, others fold K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (150) he checks, i check 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (150) he checks, i bet 100, he calls 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (350) he's all-in for 250ish, i call fim |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: QQ underpair vs shortstack 5/10
Hmmm.
I'll go ahead and make the assumption that short stack = donk. I think we can eliminate a K, since he would have probably let you know, by this point. His hand range is probably any pair (except probably AA, he woulda let you know by now) A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]x (doubtful it's the flush, can't see him pushing with that) or a 9. He probably thinks it's a split pot, and is trying to take it down, and is trying to push you off an A. If we can assume the hand range I suggested.... We lose to KK (3 combos) 44 (1 combo), 99 (1 combo), A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]9x (2 combos), 9Ts (2 combos), 98s (2 combos) and maybe a couple of other connectorish hands. We are ahead of A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]x buttload of combos JJ,TT,88-55,33-22 - 8 combos Assuming donkish tendancies to bluff you with a lot of hands, I think the call is good. Perhaps it's a leak of mine not to give short stacks enough credit, but it looks like I'm not alone, either. |
|
|