Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-21-2005, 08:22 PM
Wintermute Wintermute is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 612
Default Remaking movies the RIGHT way

Instead of remaking good old movies with new special effects (Charlie and the Choc fact) and interpretations (bad news bears) and crap, why not just take good movies and remake them with the exact same dialogue, comparable special effects, but with an entirely different cast?

One big rule would be that the actors would not be allowed to try to create a different interpretation on the role, they'd have to try to reproduce the mannerisms, etc, of the original role. It turns out to be a fun challenge when stuck in traffic or whatever to try to take a well-cast, popular movie and figure out how to recast it in a way that would be fun to watch (ie, you'd drop $10 to see it in a theater). Assume unlimited budget.

Me and friends are working on Top Gun. So far, we've got the following (and I'm just listing hte names, but a lot of thought went into most):

Maverick: Brad Pitt

Goose: THIS is where we're completely stuck. This actor has to cover a lot of range... tall, lanky/goofy, but suave enough to look realistic playing volleyball, singing You've Lost that Loving Feeling, Great Balls of Fire, and believably be able to get a chick like Meg Ryan (back then). We're braindead, best we have so far is a cross between Jared from subway and Sam Jackson

Iceman: Christian Bale

Slider: ?

Viper: Ed Harris, unless you are forced to stick him in the role of Admiral TJ Cassidy (aircraft carrier commander, played by himself)

Jester: Tom Sizemore

Charlie: Catherine Zeta-Jones

Goose's wife: others want Rachel McAdams. not me, but that's what we've got right now

Hollywood: Don Cheadle
Wolfman: ?
Cougar: ?
Merlin: ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-21-2005, 08:38 PM
The Ocho The Ocho is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 119
Default Re: Remaking movies the RIGHT way

Did you see the remake of Psycho?

I thought not.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-21-2005, 08:56 PM
Nottom Nottom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hokie Country
Posts: 4,030
Default Re: Remaking movies the RIGHT way

This is the comlpletely wrong way to remake a movie. If you are going to make the same movie why should anyone watch it instead of the original.

Remaking good popular movies is dumb.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-21-2005, 08:59 PM
PokerGoblin PokerGoblin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 115
Default Re: Remaking movies the RIGHT way

Goose: Nick Cage

Iceman: Ravishing Rick Rude from the WWF in the late 80's. That guy kicked ass.

PG
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-21-2005, 09:22 PM
Wintermute Wintermute is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 612
Default Re: Remaking movies the RIGHT way

[ QUOTE ]
Goose: Nick Cage


[/ QUOTE ]

not bad. not bad at all. he is one goofy-looking [censored]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-21-2005, 09:08 PM
James Boston James Boston is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 314
Default Re: Remaking movies the RIGHT way

[ QUOTE ]
Goose:

[/ QUOTE ] Matthew Lillard?

[ QUOTE ]
Wolfman: ?
Cougar: ?
Merlin: ?

[/ QUOTE ]

doesn't matter
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-21-2005, 09:18 PM
GrandmaStabone GrandmaStabone is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 518
Default Re: Remaking movies the RIGHT way

All I have to say is that the new Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is AWESOME!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.