#1
|
|||
|
|||
Am I reasoning correct here or just a lucky fool
What made this hand interesting was the 2 opponents in the hand with me. One was your typical solid rock, the other was a complete maniac. Maniac doesnt do the kid justice as he had pure bluffed 2 flops for massive overbets with 6 high and 72o semibluffing his 4 flush into a preflop raiser for a reraise. He was basically out of his mind and braggin about the 2k in his account etc. My thinking in this hand and the reason that I played it the way I did was that the rock had an overpair and the maniac had nothing but both were almost certainly getting it all in on the flop. Since I felt I had 12 good outs I figured I should come along for the ride. Afterwards the rock gave me a hard time about the way I played the hand saying he expected more from "12/3"-mustve had PT. He said I shouldve pushed the flop and I think he was probably right however him being in the hand even with a better hand then mine was part of my 1/3 implied odds to the flush which would help me if maniac had some small pair which was very unlikely. Habitually I fold in this spot but as I think about it now I think the best play was to push. The converter messed up the size of the pot and the actoin on the flop so I posted it unconverted underneath. thx for looking. What basically happened is the 3 of us got all in on the flop after the rock raised all in and maniac and I called.
UTG+1 rock UTG+2 maniac Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ BB (10 handed) converter BB ($10.5) UTG ($152.25) UTG+1 ($62.9) UTG+2 ($56) MP1 ($275.93) MP2 ($49) MP3 ($16.3) Hero ($181.9) Button ($50.8) SB ($154.35) Preflop: Hero is CO with T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. SB posts a blind of $0.25. <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 raises to $3</font>, UTG+2 calls $3, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, Hero calls $3, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>. Flop: ($9.75) 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 bets $9</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+2 raises to $25</font>, Hero calls $25, Hero calls $34.90. Turn: ($103.65) J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> River: ($103.65) A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> Final Pot: $103.65 ***** Hand History for Game 2275528730 ***** $50 NL Hold'em - Tuesday, June 28, 02:20:46 EDT 2005 Table Table 37362 (Real Money) Seat 9 is the button Total number of players : 10 Seat 1: hundo1 ( $10.5 ) Seat 2: KidCrush ( $152.25 ) Seat 3: ThunderGod62 ( $62.9 ) Seat 4: kschulz ( $56 ) Seat 5: jrbeckman ( $275.93 ) Seat 6: IHaveNthing ( $49 ) Seat 7: CYA1234 ( $16.3 ) Seat 10: azzkikr62 ( $154.35 ) Seat 8: SitInBackRow ( $181.9 ) Seat 9: al_coholic1 ( $50.8 ) azzkikr62 posts small blind [$0.25]. hundo1 posts big blind [$0.5]. ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to SitInBackRow [ Tc Ac ] KidCrush folds. ThunderGod62 raises [$3]. >You have options at Table 37519 Table!. kschulz calls [$3]. jrbeckman folds. IHaveNthing folds. CYA1234 folds. SitInBackRow calls [$3]. al_coholic1 folds. azzkikr62 folds. hundo1 folds. ** Dealing Flop ** [ 4c, 9c, 4d ] >You have options at Table 37304 Table!. >You have options at Table 36997 Table!. ThunderGod62 bets [$9]. kschulz raises [$25]. SitInBackRow calls [$25]. ThunderGod62 is all-In [$50.9] kschulz is all-In [$28] SitInBackRow calls [$34.9]. ** Dealing Turn ** [ Js ] ThunderGod62: don't like the cold cal much ** Dealing River ** [ Ad ] kschulz shows [ 9s, 7s ] two pairs, nines and fours. SitInBackRow shows [ Tc, Ac ] two pairs, aces and fours. ThunderGod62 doesn't show [ Qh, Qd ] two pairs, queens and fours. SitInBackRow wins $13.8 from side pot #1 with two pairs, aces and fours. SitInBackRow wins $165.75 from the main pot with two pairs, aces and fours. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Am I reasoning correct here or just a lucky fool
Which is the maniac, which is rock?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Am I reasoning correct here or just a lucky fool
Sorry UTG+1 is the rock which is why I figured he had a premium hand when he led out on the flop
UTG+2 was the maniac. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Am I reasoning correct here or just a lucky fool
In that case PF is probably not great and flop is super.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Am I reasoning correct here or just a lucky fool
yuck
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Am I reasoning correct here or just a lucky fool
Rock UTG+1 makes it 6xbb, you call in CO with ATs....
Flop action is ok, I probably play the same way if the board isn't paired. You've only got 39% equity, which isn't much of an edge in a 3-way pot. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Am I reasoning correct here or just a lucky fool
The call preflop was because of the maniac as well. In ordinary circumstances I do not even call a min raise with AQs from a tight player. I can not overemphasize the insane way the maniac was playing. After the game he moved up to 2000NL mustve been blowing off steam down with us.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Am I reasoning correct here or just a lucky fool
[ QUOTE ]
Rock UTG+1 makes it 6xbb, you call in CO with ATs.... Flop action is ok, I probably play the same way if the board isn't paired. You've only got 39% equity, which isn't much of an edge in a 3-way pot. [/ QUOTE ] It's a 6% overlay with lots of dead money in the pot. How is that not much of an edge? |
|
|