Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-25-2005, 02:13 AM
Jake (The Snake) Jake (The Snake) is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 93
Default Conceptual River Question

Here's the situation. You are heads up and have position on the river. Unknown villain who just sat down has checked. You will call a raise. What percentage (approx) of the time must you expect to be good to make betting correct?

There are more variables than those listed below, but for simplicity I will leave it at this.


Situation A: Villain has been betting/raising. Board is coordinated.

Situation B: Villain has been betting/raising. Board is NOT coordinated.

Situation C: Villain has been passive. Board is coordinated.

Situation D: Villain has been passive. Board is NOT coordinated.


Give reasons for your answers.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-25-2005, 02:29 AM
toss toss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: 2+2 Archives Digging up Gold
Posts: 1,327
Default Re: Conceptual River Question

55% for all of them. I think I read it in a book somewhere.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-25-2005, 02:39 AM
ihardlyknowher ihardlyknowher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: All-in on a draw.
Posts: 213
Default Re: Conceptual River Question

[ QUOTE ]
55% for all of them. I think I read it in a book somewhere.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's being good 55% of the time that he calls.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-25-2005, 02:52 AM
ihardlyknowher ihardlyknowher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: All-in on a draw.
Posts: 213
Default Re: Conceptual River Question

IMO, these are impossible to answer without knowing more.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-25-2005, 03:01 AM
Jake (The Snake) Jake (The Snake) is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 93
Default Re: Conceptual River Question

I think you can pretty accurately make a range of about 5% without knowing anything else. It's basically a math exercise anyway.

If we assume villain isn't folding a better hand for one bet, we can absolutely narrow the range to only 17 different numbers.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-25-2005, 03:03 AM
ihardlyknowher ihardlyknowher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: All-in on a draw.
Posts: 213
Default Re: Conceptual River Question

[ QUOTE ]
I think you can pretty accurately make a range of about 5% without knowing anything else. It's basically a math exercise anyway.

If we assume villain isn't folding a better hand for one bet, we can absolutely narrow the range to only 17 different numbers.

[/ QUOTE ]

I am interested to see the results but have had too much vodka to do the math right now. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-25-2005, 04:13 AM
Jake (The Snake) Jake (The Snake) is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 93
Default Re: Conceptual River Question

Well the initial range is really easy to do.

If you bet, your opponent is either folding, calling or raising. We'll assume for the time being that he won't fold and won't raise a worse hand.

Worst case scenario: He raises every single time he has a better hand and only calls when he has a worse hand. If this is the case, you lose 2 BB whenever you are behind and gain 1 BB when you are ahead. You need to have the best hand > 67% of the time.

Best case scenario: He always calls. You need to have the best hand > 50% of the time.

The actual number is going to fall somewhere inbetween since villain will sometimes fold, sometimes call with a better hand, sometimes raise a worse hand, etc.

What I'm most interested in is what number everybody considers to be the norm (I'm pretty sure HEPFAP or TOP says it's 55% but I can't remember) and by how much other variables in the hand like aggression and the board would change the number.

I have a feeling that the very most these factors could influence the decision is only like 5% and that we tend to think too much about these factors and not simply how often we are ahead.

Hopefully I'm not missing something ridiculous.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-25-2005, 04:51 AM
ihardlyknowher ihardlyknowher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: All-in on a draw.
Posts: 213
Default Re: Conceptual River Question

I see what you are getting at, and it make sense to my drunk ass. Theoretically, could this be purely a function of your opponents WSD and W$@SD stats?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.