If TAA is the best strategy, which is second best?

KSOT · #1 06-06-2005, 01:07 AM

no text

FlopMe · #2 06-06-2005, 01:09 AM

It seems like the sLA-A players are making the most money. TA-A might be second best.

Jakesta · #3 06-06-2005, 01:10 AM

TPA< if it exists. LPP is by far the worst to be, and LAG is down there as well.

Jakesta · #4 06-06-2005, 01:11 AM

[ QUOTE ]
It seems like the sLA-A players are making the most money. TA-A might be second best.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think that slA-A players can succeed in loose and passive games(like Party .5/1) if they keep their VP$IP in the low 20s, like 22-23. They must have good postflop play with these extra hands though.

Deamon2 · #5 06-06-2005, 01:12 AM

if a LAG has some control over himself he's probably can win. The problem is that they blow a lot of their money off on smallish pots. So, a smart LAA would probably be second (if not first) to a TAA

my roommate in college is a self-described LAG and we're both killing our dorm game and the micros at stars/party respectively

Jakesta · #6 06-06-2005, 01:13 AM

There is no way to be profitable over the long term with a 40 VP$IP in any low limit hold em game, in my estimation.

Shillx · #7 06-06-2005, 01:18 AM

Tight Passive-Aggressive and it isn't close

Aggressive play postflop takes down the money. You can't be passive and win at this game.

Brad

FlopMe · #8 06-06-2005, 01:20 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Tight Passive-Aggressive and it isn't close

[/ QUOTE ]

I rank the TP-A's third.

bottomset · #9 06-06-2005, 01:21 AM

TPA is easily the second best style

FlopMe · #10 06-06-2005, 01:35 AM

[ QUOTE ]
think that slA-A players can succeed in loose and passive games(like Party .5/1) if they keep their VP$IP in the low 20s, like 22-23. They must have good postflop play with these extra hands though.

[/ QUOTE ]

Dead,

We are in the microlimit forums so of course we're discussing loose passive games. The sLA-A players aren't just succeeding, they are crushing these games. Good post-flop play is a given.