|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: How old were you when you lost your virginity? | |||
| Under 16 |
   
|
20 | 9.62% |
| 16-18 |
  
|
82 | 39.42% |
| 19-21 |
  
|
54 | 25.96% |
| 22+ |
  
|
11 | 5.29% |
| I'm still a virgin |
  
|
41 | 19.71% |
| Voters: 208. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
06-05-2005, 01:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
The Phillies
The Phillies are now 29-27 and 1.5 games out of first place.
They have a strong rotation with Myers (who has been one of the NL's best this year), Wolf (who is finally healthy and pitching well), Lieber, Padilla (um.... who knows with this guy) and Lidle (a solid 5th). Their bullpen sucks. But they are finally hitting. So... 
|
|
#2
06-05-2005, 09:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Phillies
It's a wide open division.
FWIW, BPro gives the Mets the best chance to make the postseason (40%), then the Marlins (30%), Phillies (28%), Braves (25%), and Nationals (19%). Why are the Braves so low? They've been scoring runs despite hitting badly (that is, "timely" hitting that doesn't last) and not allowing many runs despite putting a lot of runners on (specifically, Mike Hampton). Hampton is on the DL, and so is Thomson. Our 5th starter is Seth Greisinger. [censored].
|
|
#3
06-05-2005, 10:10 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Post deleted by Mat Sklansky
|
|
#4
06-05-2005, 10:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Phillies
[ QUOTE ]
*** You are ignoring this user *** [/ QUOTE ] Yes, I agree the Marlins are the ones you really gotta look out for, but I mean they're pitching way over their heads. It'll sure be an exciting race.
|
|
#5
06-05-2005, 10:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Phillies
[ QUOTE ]
Stop the baseball posts. Baseball sucks. You'd need to get drunk or high to enjoy those games. [/ QUOTE ] get the hell outta here with that crap baseball is awesome <font color="red"> GO PHILLIES!! </font>
|
|
#6
06-05-2005, 10:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Post deleted by Mat Sklansky
|
|
#7
06-05-2005, 10:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Phillies
[ QUOTE ]
*** You are ignoring this user *** [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, I mean, Dontrelle and Becks are good, but not this good, you know?
|
|
#8
06-05-2005, 10:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Phillies
Anyone who has watched the Phillies at all over the last 100 or so years knows that they'll play well until it looks like they'll actually have a chance, at which point they will collapse.
|
|
#9
06-05-2005, 11:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Phillies
[ QUOTE ]
Anyone who has watched the Phillies at all over the last 100 or so years knows that they'll play well until it looks like they'll actually have a chance, at which point they will collapse. [/ QUOTE ] *shudder* So true.
|
|
#10
06-05-2005, 11:25 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Phillies
[ QUOTE ]
Their bullpen sucks. [/ QUOTE ] I tend to amend this with "except for Wagner and Madson." It's a shame the rest of the 'pen is so terrible, since it means they're shopping Polanco for pitching help. This will leave them no choice but to start David "E5" Bell all year. But they would probably do that anyway. Why start Polanco (.307, .779 OPS) and Utley (.309, .947 OPS) when you've got Bell (.263, .665 OPS)?
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
