#1
|
|||
|
|||
Better way to play this hand?
Party Poker 1/2 Hold'em (6 max, 5 handed) converter
Preflop: Hero is UTG with A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, MP calls, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, BB calls. Flop: (6.50 SB) T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">BB bets</font>, Hero calls, MP calls. Turn: (4.75 BB) Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> BB checks, Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">MP bets</font>, BB calls, Hero calls. River: (7.75 BB) A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> BB checks, Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">MP bets</font>, BB folds, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, <font color="#CC3333">MP 3-bets</font>, Hero calls. Final Pot: 13.75 BB Called the flop with overs+bdf+bds, the turn with overs+gs and check/raised the river when I hit my king. I called the 3-bet because the opponent was somewhat tricky. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Better way to play this hand?
[ QUOTE ]
Called the flop with overs+bdf+bds [/ QUOTE ] You don't have a backdoor straight draw here, btw, at least not in the "1.5 outs" SSH sense. You've got some sort of double inside runner-runner straight that isn't worth counting as outs. Nonetheless, I'd go for a raise on the flop. You have plenty of outs to improve, you may still have the best hand if villain is betting a draw or is on a bluff (note that a strong made hand would probably CR in this situation), and have plenty of outs to improve if you don't. You might even get a free turn card or get MP to fold something like a pocket pair or bottom pair. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Better way to play this hand?
Fold the turn.
Tiny pot, your overs could be reverse dominated, or you could be drawing dead. Sorry, mis-read. As you didn't fold the turn, I'd bet the river, call a raise. You don't want to be putting 3 bets in. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Better way to play this hand?
[ QUOTE ]
You don't have a backdoor straight draw here, btw, at least not in the "1.5 outs" SSH sense. You've got some sort of double inside runner-runner straight that isn't worth counting as outs. [/ QUOTE ] True, I think Ed says to count it for .5. [ QUOTE ] Nonetheless, I'd go for a raise on the flop. You have plenty of outs to improve, you may still have the best hand if villain is betting a draw or is on a bluff (note that a strong made hand would probably CR in this situation), and have plenty of outs to improve if you don't. You might even get a free turn card or get MP to fold something like a pocket pair or bottom pair. [/ QUOTE ] You're absolutely right. Thanks! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Better way to play this hand?
[ QUOTE ]
Tiny pot, your overs could be reverse dominated, or you could be drawing dead. [/ QUOTE ] You did notice that 3 cards make him the nuts on the river, right? The J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] is probably worth half an out also, and the overcards maybe 3 outs. With a total of 6.5 outs and the pot laying him 1:6, it's still close, but peeling one off here isn't terrible. Having said that, I'd probably still find a fold given the reverse implied odds we may be giving if our overcard outs are tainted. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Better way to play this hand?
I play the same way you did until the river. I like the river checkraise play as much as anyone, but not with just TPTK. There's a reason why you discount your overcard outs, and it's not because you should checkraise when you spike one.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Better way to play this hand?
I cant see anything wrong with the way you played this hand.
If MP was slow-playing a set or picked up 2 pair on the turn it was not possible to deduce that from his play. He appeared to have a Q in his hand with his bet on the turn. Following your c/r on the river, I think you have to call his 3-bet for the size of the pot. You cant afford to risk losing a pot like that to a bluff. And if you had folded correctly to his 3-bet on the river, it would probably have encouraged him to bluff at you on subsequent occassions. Having now read the previous posts, I agree that you should just have bet the river, because of the risk of being reverse-dominated. |
|
|