Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-25-2005, 01:48 PM
MrWookie47 MrWookie47 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ^^ That wookie
Posts: 1,485
Default Just WB with TT?

I was playing some 1/2 6max on Party clearing the bonus when this hand came up. Villain had just sat down a few hands ago but had been super-aggressive with the few hands he had played. He showed down some premium stuff, however, so he might just be a lucksack.

Party Poker 1/2 Hold'em (6 max, 5 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is UTG with T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
<font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, <font color="#CC3333">MP 3-bets</font>, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, Hero calls.

Flop: (7.50 SB) A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
Hero???

Of typical 6max preflop 3-betting hands, I'm ahead of 99, KQs, and maybe 88. I'm drawing to quads (if that) against everything else. What is your line? I considered c/c - c/c - bet/call, c/c - c/c - bet/fold, c/c - c/c - check/fold, check/calling all the way, open-folding...I wasn't sure.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-25-2005, 01:54 PM
gharp gharp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Utah (sigh)
Posts: 270
Default Re: Just WB with TT?

Well I think I'd rule out open-folding [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]. I'd definitely stick a bet out there on the flop and see what happens. There's a good chance that board is scary to him too.

I'm also not sure I could get away from this hand unless a K or Q fell on the turn. My line would probably be bet/call; check/call; check/call. If you're feeling frisky, you could also try to represent the case A (bet/3-bet; lead turn...).
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-25-2005, 01:57 PM
irishpint irishpint is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: what you want, G?
Posts: 1,249
Default Re: Just WB with TT?

hmm i might try and find a fold here, but i dunno how to get to that. i feel like you're either going to see that ace or a larget PP.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-25-2005, 01:59 PM
Jaran Jaran is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 69
Default Re: Just WB with TT?

My line is moronic, but here it is...ck/c, ck/c, c/r, if no overs to my pp fall.

-Jaran
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-25-2005, 02:07 PM
MrWookie47 MrWookie47 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ^^ That wookie
Posts: 1,485
Default Re: Just WB with TT?

Check/raise? Do you think I'm good often enough, or are you trying to push him around?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-25-2005, 02:12 PM
Disconnected Disconnected is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: You guys playing cards?
Posts: 231
Default Re: Just WB with TT?

I'd c/c unless it gets checked through, in which case I'd bet the following street.

If you thought you could take him off a typical 3-bet hand (doesn't seem like it in this case), I'd lead each street until raised, then c/c.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-25-2005, 02:16 PM
Jaran Jaran is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 69
Default Re: Just WB with TT?

Although your read is only over a few hands, for some reason I don't put him on a big pp here. But I've been away from the game for a while, so I really suck (whereas I only marginally sucked before).
Honestly, I think you are good here unless an over falls. Call me wacky.

-Jaran
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-25-2005, 02:54 PM
@bsolute_luck @bsolute_luck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hi...I\'m in Delaware
Posts: 1,622
Default Re: Just WB with TT?

bet. see what happens after that. if he folds oh well, if he calls, keep betting, if he raises...hmmmm...call down.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-25-2005, 05:09 PM
MrWookie47 MrWookie47 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ^^ That wookie
Posts: 1,485
Default Re: Just WB with TT?

I've been thinking about this hand some more, and I see that it's not a traditional WA/WB situation, in that betting out will not necessarily cause a lesser hand to just fold. Unlike scaring off someone with KK/QQ on an A high board, 88 and 99 are apt to call down (or even raise) on this board (KQs will probably fold). That said, there are a lot more hands that I'm behind than I'm ahead, here.

Have me whooped:
AK (4), AQ (4), KK (6), QQ (6), JJ (6) = 26 hands

I whoop:
99 (6), 88 (6), KQs (4) = 16 hands

Tie with TT (1)

That's a moderately aggressive list of 3betting hands for 6max play, and it doesn't look like I'm good often enough to be able to raise for value. I can be fairly sure that it's going to cost me 2.5 BB to showdown and try to win 6.25 BB. It looks like showing down is good, but if that list of hands gets trimmed at all to look more like a full ring list, things start looking grim fast.

I also don't think I have much folding equity amongst hands that have me crushed. QQ and JJ aren't going to give me credit for KK because I didn't cap preflop. Even if I scare them with lots of pressure, I think an unknown will tend to call down with these here rather than fold to possible quads.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-25-2005, 06:10 PM
shadow29 shadow29 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: ATL
Posts: 178
Default Re: Just WB with TT?

Me gusta:

c/c, c/c, c/c.

If he checks behind on any street, bet the next street.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.