#1
|
|||
|
|||
NL Decision - Opinions Please
Player A bets $100
Player B calls $100 and raises $60 more (all-in). $160 total. Player C calls the $160 and raises $80 more (all-in). $240 total. Player D calls $240. Back to Player A. What are his options? Keep in mind that in NL a raise must equal the previous bet in order for the betting to be reopened by a player that has already acted on his hand. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL Decision - Opinions Please
This reminds me of the LSAT.... but ill take a shot at it....
If "in NL a raise must equal the previous bet in order for the betting to be reopened by a player that has already acted on his hand" is always true, then the player can only call. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL Decision - Opinions Please
I don't understand your question. Are you asking whether or not Player A is allowed to raise?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL Decision - Opinions Please
[ QUOTE ]
in NL a raise must equal the previous bet in order for the betting to be reopened by a player that has already acted on his hand. [/ QUOTE ] Since you said a raise and not cumulative raises, he can call. Just a guess though. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL Decision - Opinions Please
Player A can either raise, call, or fold.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL Decision - Opinions Please
raise $380 or more, call, fold
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL Decision - Opinions Please
Call or fold. No individual raised enough to reopen the betting.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Online? Anything is possible
This particular code is mostly botched everywhere. The most common is that any trivial raise reopens the action. An example:
A - $200 B - $200 C - $21 A bets $20. B must realise he is open to a big re-raise when C pushes in. It ain't right but it's the same for everyone. This ain't bean bag. Imagine a day when the big sites get the blinds and button to behave like RL. Add 5 years and that's when this issue will be fixed. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL Decision - Opinions Please
Keep in mind that in NL a raise must equal the previous bet in order for the betting to be reopened by a player that has already acted on his hand.
sorry to get involved, because i rarely play nl, but who says this is the case? so in nl if i bet $500 someone with money (not all in) can't raise me $250? they have to raise $500? i didn't know that if that is the case, then it seems logical to me that Player A hasn't been raised by Player B, but he has been raised $140 by Player C, so he can fold, call, raise $140 or more, or raise all in |
|
|