Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-15-2005, 08:44 AM
cnfuzzd cnfuzzd is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 38
Default selective passivity out of the BB

Button is super donk. other two are little donklings. Serious. Thats my read.

Party Poker 3/6 Hold'em (9 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is BB with 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, MP2 calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, CO calls, Button calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Hero checks.

Flop: (4.33 SB) 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
Hero checks, MP2 checks, CO checks, <font color="#CC3333">Button bets</font>, Hero calls, MP2 folds, CO folds.

Turn: (3.16 BB) A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">Button bets</font>, Hero calls.

River: (5.16 BB) K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
Hero checks, <font color="#CC3333">Button bets</font>, Hero calls.

Final Pot: 7.16 BB
<font color="#009B00">Main Pot: 7.16 BB, between Hero and Button.</font>

thoughts?

for the record, i thought about checkraising the river, but decided that was pushing it too far.

peace

john nickle
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-15-2005, 08:48 AM
adamstewart adamstewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 385
Default Re: selective passivity out of the BB

Hmmmm.......

I'm wondering why you didn't raise the flop?



Regarless, I would have led the turn (fold to a raise).


Adam
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-15-2005, 09:01 AM
Carmine Carmine is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 36
Default Re: selective passivity out of the BB

[ QUOTE ]
Hmmmm.......

I'm wondering why you didn't raise the flop?



Regarless, I would have led the turn (fold to a raise).


Adam

[/ QUOTE ]

Isn't the problem of folding to a turn raise that we miss the opportunity to hit our flush draw. Not the best draw in the world but still another way to win.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-15-2005, 09:07 AM
elindauer elindauer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 292
Default Re: selective passivity out of the BB

With this highly vulnerable hand, you must raise the flop if you choose to play.

Good luck.
Eric
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-15-2005, 09:27 AM
adamstewart adamstewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 385
Default Re: selective passivity out of the BB

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Hmmmm.......

I'm wondering why you didn't raise the flop?



Regarless, I would have led the turn (fold to a raise).


Adam

[/ QUOTE ]

Isn't the problem of folding to a turn raise that we miss the opportunity to hit our flush draw. Not the best draw in the world but still another way to win.

[/ QUOTE ]


To be honest, I didn't notice the flush draw when I initially read the hand.

In this situation, if Hero led the turn, and was raised, he'd be getting 6:1 to call. He has 9 outs to a flush, but we should discount them to about 4 outs for the times he makes the flush but still loses to a higher flush, or boat, or quads.

I don't give any outs for the Hero hitting an 8, as I feel that would be negligable given the overpaired Kings on board.

I give 1 out for hitting one of the two 3 threes.

That gives us 5 effective outs. Not enough to call a turn raise.


Note: the pot odds would be slightly different had Hero raised the flop, but I still don't think it would work out the enough to call a turn raise.


Adam
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-15-2005, 09:29 AM
chesspain chesspain is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Southern New Hampshire
Posts: 1,930
Default Re: selective passivity out of the BB

[ QUOTE ]
With this highly vulnerable hand, you must raise the flop if you choose to play.


[/ QUOTE ]

With emphasis on "if."
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-15-2005, 09:50 AM
Piiop Piiop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 77
Default Re: selective passivity out of the BB

If you checkraised the river, and he called you and showed something like Q9 - that would be sweet.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-15-2005, 09:55 AM
Carmine Carmine is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 36
Default Re: selective passivity out of the BB

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Hmmmm.......

I'm wondering why you didn't raise the flop?



Regarless, I would have led the turn (fold to a raise).


Adam

[/ QUOTE ]

Isn't the problem of folding to a turn raise that we miss the opportunity to hit our flush draw. Not the best draw in the world but still another way to win.

[/ QUOTE ]


To be honest, I didn't notice the flush draw when I initially read the hand.

In this situation, if Hero led the turn, and was raised, he'd be getting 6:1 to call. He has 9 outs to a flush, but we should discount them to about 4 outs for the times he makes the flush but still loses to a higher flush, or boat, or quads.

I don't give any outs for the Hero hitting an 8, as I feel that would be negligable given the overpaired Kings on board.

I give 1 out for hitting one of the two 3 threes.

That gives us 5 effective outs. Not enough to call a turn raise.


Note: the pot odds would be slightly different had Hero raised the flop, but I still don't think it would work out the enough to call a turn raise.


Adam

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh, I agree he doesn't have odds to call a turn raise. I meant just C/call the turn being the [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] fell. Only because of the way Hero played it so far. I would have preferred to raise the flop THEN lead the turn. Now you could say that by C/R the turn (being he didn't raise flop)Hero is representing an A. Problem is Villian could have easily bet the flop with Ace high.

The more I write the more I realize we're not looking so good here. Villian's likely holdings:
Ace= Bad
K = Bad
PP = Bad
What else except a pure bluff?

Without raising the flop we have no option but to play passively and try for the flush and if the turn ace had been another other flavor we fold right there. unless you can assign villians a large % that he is bluffing.

Is my thinking flawed here??

EDIT: Well I guess by C/R the turn and representing an A or K we could POSSIBLY push Villian off a PP.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-15-2005, 09:56 AM
adamstewart adamstewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 385
Default Re: selective passivity out of the BB

[ QUOTE ]
If you checkraised the river, and he called you and showed something like Q9 - that would be sweet.

[/ QUOTE ]

nh [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-15-2005, 09:57 AM
adamstewart adamstewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 385
Default Re: selective passivity out of the BB

Ace is a scare card.

Leading the turn may win the pot right there.


Adam
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.