Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-03-2005, 02:32 AM
doubleplus doubleplus is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3
Default Checking the river w/ trips vs. possible flush:

I pussied out on the river. I know it would normally be correct to bet it with such a strong hand vs. chasers. But I figured at least one of them had to be on a flush draw, and that an argument could be made that I'll save more bets than I win with the same play, in the long run.

No reads on anyone... I'd just recently sat in. On a side note, I finally graduated myself up to 0.50-1 today after hitting $100 from 25-50. All the .50-1 tables on PStars have an average pot of 6-7 or less, but I just read on another thread that PP tables are *normally* at least 9-10BB. Wtf? They're really that loose?

PokerStars 0.50/1.00 Hold'em (9 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is MP3 with A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, SB calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, UTG+1 calls.

Flop: (7 SB) J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">SB bets</font>, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, SB calls, UTG+1 calls.

Turn: (6.50 BB) J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
SB checks, UTG+1 checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, SB calls, UTG+1 calls.

River: (9.50 BB) 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
Checked to Hero, who checks.

Final Pot: 9.50 BB
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-03-2005, 02:46 AM
Emmitt2222 Emmitt2222 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Viva la Papa
Posts: 576
Default Re: Checking the river w/ set vs. possible flush:

First of all you don't have a set, you have trips. A set is when you are holding a pp and hit three of a kind. Sorry to nitpick.

Anyway, this is an easy value bet, especailly at the .5/1. These people could be calling with a straight draw, a pp, bottom pair, basically anything. If you get checkraised you should still probably call it because of the size of the pot, although I could see some argueing for folding. Try not to see monsters under the bed though. The most important thing to understand is that in the micros you can't bluff or steal much so you have to valuebet valuebet valuebet the heck out of these fish. The definition of value betting is betting a marginal holding on the river against people who are morons and likely to pay you off with an even worse hand. In this case you have a very solid hand, not even marginal so I believe this is an easy bet. If someone bets into you I would just call and if they c/r you I would still call.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-03-2005, 02:25 PM
FishHooks FishHooks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 596
Default Re: Checking the river w/ set vs. possible flush:

I agree with your value bet on the river, but having 3 of a kind weather or not its from a PP is still called a set and trips.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-03-2005, 02:47 PM
Catt Catt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 998
Default Re: Checking the river w/ set vs. possible flush:

[ QUOTE ]
I agree with your value bet on the river, but having 3 of a kind weather or not its from a PP is still called a set and trips.

[/ QUOTE ]

Most people here (and most poker books) use "set" specifically to describe 3 of a kind made with a pocket pair and "trips" specifically to describe 3 of a kind with a pair on the board. Because a set is so much more deceptive than trips the hands often play very differently.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-03-2005, 03:28 AM
btspider btspider is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 39
Default Re: Checking the river w/ trips vs. possible flush:

[ QUOTE ]
I know it would normally be correct to bet it with such a strong hand vs. chasers.

[/ QUOTE ]

then bet and call a check-raise.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-03-2005, 02:14 PM
doubleplus doubleplus is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3
Default Re: Checking the river w/ trips vs. possible flush:

Yeah, well, I'd just lost another big pot to someone, after flopping a set... and raising like a mofo... only to have him make his flush on the river. His pocket cards? 7d 2d! I almost pulled a Hellmuth. But, yes, I'll probably bet the river next time.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-03-2005, 03:44 PM
ErrantNight ErrantNight is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1
Default Re: Checking the river w/ trips vs. possible flush:

[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, well, I'd just lost another big pot to someone, after flopping a set... and raising like a mofo... only to have him make his flush on the river. His pocket cards? 7d 2d! I almost pulled a Hellmuth. But, yes, I'll bet the river next time.

[/ QUOTE ]


I fixed your post.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-03-2005, 04:47 PM
CourtesyFlush CourtesyFlush is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 272
Default Re: Checking the river w/ trips vs. possible flush:

I will concur that you definitely pussied out on the river. Clear value bet. Remember that it's actually semi-rare for someone to flop a flush draw. Around the same chance as flopping a set. It is much more likely for them to have lesser hands that will call your river bet.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.