Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-25-2005, 12:24 AM
Justin A Justin A is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: I travel the world and the seven seas
Posts: 494
Default Q9 suited... er... offsuit

Party Poker 5/10 Hold'em (6 max, 6 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is Button with 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. CO posts a blind of $5.
UTG calls, MP calls, CO (poster) checks, Hero calls, SB completes, BB checks.

Flop: (6 SB) T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(6 players)</font>
SB checks, <font color="#CC3333">BB bets</font>, UTG calls, <font color="#CC3333">MP raises</font>, CO folds, <font color="#CC3333">Hero 3-bets</font>...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-25-2005, 12:26 AM
brettbrettr brettbrettr is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: Q9 suited... er... offsuit

What's your question? Pre-flop seems fine, flop seems fine.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-25-2005, 12:29 AM
Justin A Justin A is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: I travel the world and the seven seas
Posts: 494
Default Re: Q9 suited... er... offsuit

[ QUOTE ]
What's your question? Pre-flop seems fine, flop seems fine.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah that's all, nothing special just checking up. Been away from 6max for a while.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-25-2005, 12:40 AM
brettbrettr brettbrettr is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: Q9 suited... er... offsuit

Do you limp there w/o the poster?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-25-2005, 01:29 AM
Scotch78 Scotch78 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1
Default Re: Q9 suited... er... offsuit

Given the two-flush and worthlessness of your pair outs, you need two callers (plus the bettor) to get equity out of your draw, and that is much more likely if you just call the flop. Furthermore, given the action so far and the size of the pot there's likely to be at least two opponents matching your money on the turn. While that's not enough to match your pot equity at that point, it does lower the cost noticeably. Raising is likely to knock someone out, decreasing your flop value, so the intended gain is a free card. However, it's saving you less than a small bet, for the turn equity reasons already mentioned. Then we need to consider who will pay you off when you hit. The flush draw will pay if you hit on the turn, but only pairs will pay off on the river. 3-betting now makes that much less likely, especially from a ten. For all that, and a few smaller reasons, I just call the flop.

Scott
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-25-2005, 03:52 AM
Justin A Justin A is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: I travel the world and the seven seas
Posts: 494
Default Re: Q9 suited... er... offsuit

[ QUOTE ]
Given the two-flush and worthlessness of your pair outs, you need two callers (plus the bettor) to get equity out of your draw, and that is much more likely if you just call the flop. Furthermore, given the action so far and the size of the pot there's likely to be at least two opponents matching your money on the turn. While that's not enough to match your pot equity at that point, it does lower the cost noticeably. Raising is likely to knock someone out, decreasing your flop value, so the intended gain is a free card. However, it's saving you less than a small bet, for the turn equity reasons already mentioned. Then we need to consider who will pay you off when you hit. The flush draw will pay if you hit on the turn, but only pairs will pay off on the river. 3-betting now makes that much less likely, especially from a ten. For all that, and a few smaller reasons, I just call the flop.

Scott

[/ QUOTE ]

I like this whole thought process. I went for the free card, and got screwed when the original flop raiser led into me on a turn blank after everyone called the flop.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-25-2005, 03:53 AM
Justin A Justin A is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: I travel the world and the seven seas
Posts: 494
Default Re: Q9 suited... er... offsuit

[ QUOTE ]
Do you limp there w/o the poster?

[/ QUOTE ]

you mean if he limped instead of posted? then yes.

if you meant after only two limpers, still yes.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.