Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-24-2005, 01:38 PM
snakehead snakehead is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: california
Posts: 516
Default sometimes it pays to play tight

this was a very aggressive game on empire.

***** Hand History for Game

30/60 TexasHTGameTable (Limit) -

Table Table 14441 (Real Money) -- Seat 10 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 1: Magic_Aces ( $1354.5)
Seat 2: georgegee ( $2291)
Seat 3: snakehead ( $1544.5)
Seat 4: AStorm ( $5162)
Seat 5: mike486 ( $1386.5)
Seat 6: fishfcuker ( $2695.5)
Seat 7: KUZZ1 ( $5282)
Seat 8: ILikeUBetty ( $2428.5)
Seat 9: am130468 ( $5860.75)
Seat 10: DrDumass ( $6176.75)
Magic_Aces posts small blind (15)
georgegee posts big blind (30)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to snakehead [ 4d, 4c ]
snakehead folds.
AStorm folds.
mike486 raises (60) to 60
fishfcuker folds.
KUZZ1 folds.
ILikeUBetty folds.
am130468 folds.
DrDumass folds.
Magic_Aces folds.
georgegee raises (60) to 90
mike486 calls (30)
** Dealing Flop ** : [ 4s, Jh, Jc ]
georgegee bets (30)
mike486 calls (30)
** Dealing Turn ** : [ 7h ]
georgegee bets (60)
mike486 calls (60)
** Dealing River ** : [ 4h ]
georgegee bets (60)
mike486 raises (120) to 120
georgegee raises (120) to 180
mike486 raises (120) to 240
georgegee calls (60)
** Summary **
Main Pot: $852 | Rake: $3
Board: [ 4s Jh Jc 7h 4h ]
Magic_Aces balance $1339.5, lost $15 (folded)
georgegee balance $1871, lost $420 [ 7s 7d ] [ a full house, Sevens full of jacks -- Jh,Jc,7s,7d,7h ]
snakehead balance $1544.5, didn't bet (folded)
AStorm balance $5162, didn't bet (folded)
mike486 balance $1818.5, bet $420, collected $852, net +$432 [ Jd Js ] [ four of a kind, jacks -- Jd,Js,Jh,Jc,7h ]
fishfcuker balance $2695.5, didn't bet (folded)
KUZZ1 balance $5282, didn't bet (folded)
ILikeUBetty balance $2428.5, didn't bet (folded)
am130468 balance $5860.75, didn't bet (folded)
DrDumass balance $6176.75, didn't bet (folded)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-24-2005, 01:45 PM
stoxtrader stoxtrader is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 219
Default Re: sometimes it pays to play tight

folding 44 UTG in 30/60 isnt all *that* tight.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-24-2005, 01:50 PM
lostinthought lostinthought is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 306
Default Re: sometimes it pays to play tight

[ QUOTE ]
folding 44 UTG in 30/60 isnt all *that* tight.

[/ QUOTE ]

but, if it's 55, then it's a limp-reraise ala bicyclekick.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-24-2005, 01:50 PM
dankhank dankhank is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: boston
Posts: 87
Default Re: sometimes it pays to play tight

if you really, really wanted to play it but folded, doesn't that make it a tight fold?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-24-2005, 03:29 PM
snakehead snakehead is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: california
Posts: 516
Default Re: sometimes it pays to play tight

[ QUOTE ]

folding 44 UTG in 30/60 isnt all *that* tight.


[/ QUOTE ]

that wasn't exactly the point of the post.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-24-2005, 03:48 PM
stoxtrader stoxtrader is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 219
Default Re: sometimes it pays to play tight

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

folding 44 UTG in 30/60 isnt all *that* tight.


[/ QUOTE ]

that wasn't exactly the point of the post.

[/ QUOTE ]

I know, it was kind of a nitty comment. sorry.

the title of the post prompted my reply.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-24-2005, 04:02 PM
surfdoc surfdoc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 140
Default Re: sometimes it pays to play tight

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

folding 44 UTG in 30/60 isnt all *that* tight.


[/ QUOTE ]

that wasn't exactly the point of the post.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not trying at all to be an ass but I am curious as to what was the point?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-24-2005, 04:39 PM
lostinthought lostinthought is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 306
Default Re: sometimes it pays to play tight

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

folding 44 UTG in 30/60 isnt all *that* tight.


[/ QUOTE ]

that wasn't exactly the point of the post.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not trying at all to be an ass but I am curious as to what was the point?

[/ QUOTE ]

dude, if he would have called with 'wired 4's ' he could have won a GINORMOUS pot.. duhduhduhduh..
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-24-2005, 04:42 PM
jayheaps jayheaps is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 336
Default Re: sometimes it pays to play tight

apparently mike486 doesnt know how to read a board.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-24-2005, 04:42 PM
surfdoc surfdoc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 140
Default Re: sometimes it pays to play tight

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

folding 44 UTG in 30/60 isnt all *that* tight.


[/ QUOTE ]

that wasn't exactly the point of the post.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not trying at all to be an ass but I am curious as to what was the point?

[/ QUOTE ]

dude, if he would have called with 'wired 4's ' he could have won a GINORMOUS pot.. duhduhduhduh..

[/ QUOTE ]

So, let me get this right. Every time we fold a hand (appropriately) preflop that makes a monster we should post it here or otherwise give a rats ass? Just rechecked the hand, looks like hero would have taken a big beating here.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.