#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dueling With A Passive
This guy was very loose (>60) but pretty passive (~1.5). Anyone think the river cap was too much?
Party Poker 3/6 Hold'em (7 handed) converter Preflop: Hero is BB with J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666">4 folds</font>, SB completes, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, SB calls. Flop: (4 SB) Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> SB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">SB raises</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero 3-bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">SB caps</font>, Hero calls. Turn: (6 BB) 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> SB checks, Hero checks. River: (6 BB) J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">SB bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, <font color="#CC3333">SB 3-bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero caps</font>, SB calls. Final Pot: 14 BB |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dueling With A Passive
I haven't played many hands with quite this sort of stop-and-start action. I guess the turn was kind of an intermission.
Anyway, SB liked his hand enough to checkraise and then cap the flop. Then after the board paired, he decided to check the turn. Possibly his Q3 just got counterfeited, or maybe the flush or straight or even the set he just knew would come in hadn't yet. (1.5 isn't that passive, and the pot is heads-up.) Or maybe he started liking his hand that much more and decided to go for another checkraise. To me, the river cap does seem a bit much. But at least you didn't have to worry about a 5-bet. I'm guessing your plan on a river blank was to call a bet, which does seem reasonable to me. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dueling With A Passive
I wouldn't cap that river. That crazy flop action followed by a turn check should look very suspcious to you. It either means he's full/trips or he got counterfeited. IMO the first is more likely than the second.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dueling With A Passive
[ QUOTE ]
This guy was very loose (>60) but pretty passive (~1.5). [/ QUOTE ] I'll be blunt. You don't understand the pokertraker aggression factor. Look into how it is calculated. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dueling With A Passive
I would definitely hold my breath and bet the turn.
-Michael |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dueling With A Passive
This guy is hardly passive. I would bet the turn. Your hand isn't quite strong enough to pull this play imo.
Brad |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dueling With A Passive
I almost said that too. It looks like he's either drawing dea/really thin or we are royally fu[/i]cked. I guess its hard to tell how much of which but that turn check looks really suspicous to me though.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dueling With A Passive
Well I would be real hesitant if there weren't two spades on the flop.
-Michael |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dueling With A Passive
Yea, but that kinda action is pair+draw really often I think......and we know what just happened there. I dunno, wouldn't be the first time I've been accused of being weak tight. But don't you think if he's having that much trouble keeping it in his pants w/ a semi bluff he's going to lead the turn?
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dueling With A Passive
I don't know if he'll lead the turn or not, really. But I would bet this with the intention of folding to a raise. If he's flushing it's imperative you get a bet in here, and if he's not, well, are you really folding the river? I feel real comfortable folding to a raise here so it's an easy bet.
-Michael |
|
|