#1
|
|||
|
|||
Fun w/ Fish
Ocean's Eleven 8-16. This is the table's first orbit, so nobody has any solid reads on each other, except sitting on The Dude's immediate left is are 2+2'ers Justin A and NL Soiler. UTG in this hand is a middle-aged Asian lady, and at the time seemed to fit the loose passive stereotype. IMPORTANT NOTE: The Dude and Justin A have a history of player over-aggro against each other, and each of us took that into consideration in how we played this hand.
Preflop: UTG limps, folded the The Dude in MP who raises. Justin A 3-bets in LMP w/ A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. Folded back to UTG who calls, The Dude caps, both call. Flop: (13.5 SBs) Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] UTG checks, The Dude bets, Justin A raises. UTG check-3bets, The Dude caps. Justin A calls, UTG shakes her head and calls. Turn: (12.75 BBs) 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] UTG checks, The Dude bets, Justin A raises. UTG throws 2 more bets in, looking completely disgusted as she does it (I'm sure you guys have seen this - the old "I'm seeing a showdown no matter what river card comes or how many bets, but I know I'm losing this hand), The Dude 3-bets. Justin A calls, UTG calls. River: (21.75 BBs) A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] UTG checks, The Dude looks at Justin A with suspicion and checks, Justin A bets. Both call. Comments on all aspects of the hand appreciated. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fun w/ Fish
I don't get it.
You 3-bet the turn, yet call the river when you improve to a set. Do you think justin has KJs (which makes no sense according to the betting and justin's skill, so I'm very confused.)? C/Raise the river! Is this so obvious I am missing something? Edit: are we worried about UTG? Is she so passive she will play 2 pair+ better this weakly? I don't think we can worry about her.. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fun w/ Fish
[ QUOTE ]
Is this so obvious I am missing something? [/ QUOTE ] Justin A has AA, not The Dude. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fun w/ Fish
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Is this so obvious I am missing something? [/ QUOTE ] Justin A has AA, not The Dude. [/ QUOTE ] Sorry, drinking and small stakes hold em sucks. QQ/KK/AQs no good? If those were your hands, I have no problen with the play (though QQ I would think a river raise is in order unless you know justin THAT well.) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fun w/ Fish
bump, for the non-graveyard crew.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fun w/ Fish
He nailed a 2-outer over your TT set, tough one. Oh, and the nit has AQ or KQ.
Go Pats! Joe Tall |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fun w/ Fish
I hope you at least called Justin a fish for sucking out on you
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fun w/ Fish
I take it The Dude either had QQ or TT?
What did UTG have anyway? [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] Adam |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fun w/ Fish
[ QUOTE ]
He nailed a 2-outer over your TT set, tough one. Oh, and the nit has AQ or KQ. [/ QUOTE ] I did have TT, but I didn't intend for this post to be about guessing my hand or about being sucked out on. Anybody have any comments on how the hand was played? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Fun w/ Fish
[ QUOTE ]
What did UTG have anyway? [/ QUOTE ] Joe Tall was wrong about this one. UTG had 66. This was the first set-over-set-over-set hand that I can remember actually playing in. (I witnessed one at my table before, but I folded pf.) |
|
|