#1
|
|||
|
|||
77 - 2 hands
No reads.
Party Poker 1/2 Hold'em (9 handed) converter Preflop: Hero is UTG+1 with 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. UTG folds, Hero calls, MP1 folds, MP2 folds, MP3 folds, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises</font>, Button folds, SB folds, BB folds, Hero calls. Flop: (5.50 SB) 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero 3-bets</font>, CO calls. Turn: (5.75 BB) Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, CO folds. Final Pot: 6.75 BB Second hand, also no reads. Party Poker 1/2 Hold'em (9 handed) converter Preflop: Hero is BB with 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. UTG folds, UTG+1 folds, MP1 folds, MP2 folds, MP3 folds, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises</font>, Button calls, SB folds, Hero calls. Flop: (6.50 SB) 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, CO calls, Button calls. Turn: (4.75 BB) 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, CO calls, Button calls. River: (7.75 BB) 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font> Hero checks, CO checks, <font color="#CC3333">Button bets</font>, Hero folds, CO folds. Final Pot: 8.75 BB |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 77 - Aggro check
what did you put CO on?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 77 - Aggro check
Bluff. Shown any resistance on the turn and I would have folded. In hindsight, I can see I was bluffing too representing AX.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 77 - Aggro check
Hands like this are impossible to anaylze without a read. If I'm the CO and I know that you are a good player, there is zero doubt in my mind that you don't have an ace and I call-call-raise. Against a weak-tight player the best play might be to check-call the flop and bet the turn. A bad player might see your line here as "wow he is going nuts, he must have an ace" and throw away his kings. I tend not to like this play though.
Brad |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 77 - Aggro check
Update, easy laydown on the 2nd hand?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 77 - Aggro check
I don't understand what hands the 4s causes you to be losing to now, that you were ahead of on the turn. I'd call this river.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 77 - Aggro check
6X?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 77 - Aggro check
[ QUOTE ]
6X? [/ QUOTE ] yes the almighty 45689 straight |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 77 - Aggro check
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 6X? [/ QUOTE ] yes the almighty 45689 straight [/ QUOTE ] Haha oh man, I'm going to step away from my tables. Thanks for pointing it out, there's my fish-moment for the day. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 77 - Aggro check
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] 6X? [/ QUOTE ] yes the almighty 45689 straight [/ QUOTE ] Haha oh man, I'm going to step away from my tables. Thanks for pointing it out, there's my fish-moment for the day. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] it's ok |
|
|