Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-31-2004, 05:09 PM
Schizo Schizo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SSH, Theory, TH forums only.
Posts: 744
Default Conflicts in SSH + POP

In SSH it says I can play this simply on position but it does not take into consideration pot odds. In POP it says I need 1/5 odds to call. Should I play or not play?

Party Poker 2/4 Hold'em (9 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is CO with 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
UTG folds, UTG+1 folds, MP1 folds, MP2 folds, MP3 calls, Hero folds, Button calls, SB completes, BB checks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-31-2004, 05:15 PM
River2Pair River2Pair is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 121
Default Re: Conflicts in SSH + POP

If MP3 limps a lot from there and a raise can get you heads up, that is a decent option.

Or you can limp and try to hit a set (or win a small pot unimproved) if you feel like gambling.

Or you can fold and wait for a better spot.

My point being, there probably isn't a clear cut answer.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-31-2004, 10:58 PM
StellarWind StellarWind is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 704
Default Re: Conflicts in SSH + POP

[ QUOTE ]
In SSH it says I can play this simply on position but it does not take into consideration pot odds. In POP it says I need 1/5 odds to call. Should I play or not play?

[/ QUOTE ]
What is POP?

Unless an all-in situation is involved, pot odds should never appear in a discussion of preflop play. Most of the cost and benefit of playing a hand is postflop. Pot odds have very little to do with the real odds (the implied odds) you are getting on a preflop call.

In a typical 2/4 situation I would limp behind MP3 with any pocket pair. It's not a big deal whatever you do.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-31-2004, 11:05 PM
SCfuji SCfuji is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 467
Default Re: Conflicts in SSH + POP

i try to iso if im going to play. if not the other two alternatives are folding (i dont like) and let the blinds play to get paid-off if you hit a set.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-31-2004, 11:31 PM
dfscott dfscott is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 57
Default Re: Conflicts in SSH + POP

[ QUOTE ]
What is POP?

[/ QUOTE ]

I've previously seen POP as a reference to The Psychology of Poker, but I haven't read it so I can't confirm.

FWIW, I would fold this first in from MP, but would play with one or more limpers ahead.

Edit: Doh -- this was in LP. I would raise first in from LP but fold first in from LP. As in MP, with 1+ limper(s), I'm ready to limp along.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-31-2004, 11:41 PM
Rudbaeck Rudbaeck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 555
Default Re: Conflicts in SSH + POP

[ QUOTE ]
What is POP?

Unless an all-in situation is involved, pot odds should never appear in a discussion of preflop play. Most of the cost and benefit of playing a hand is postflop. Pot odds have very little to do with the real odds (the implied odds) you are getting on a preflop call.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think OP means TOP, and Sklansky does discuss pot odds in preflop play. It's in the discussion about implied odds, where he says 5:1 preflop pot odds is enough with the implied odds to make a call for a 7.5:1 shot worth it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.